2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2302862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Development and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
4
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following several previous meta-analyses (Doucouliagos, 2005;Efendic et al, 2011;Valickova et al, 2015), for the summary statistic we use the partial correlation coefficient (PCC), which can be derived as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following several previous meta-analyses (Doucouliagos, 2005;Efendic et al, 2011;Valickova et al, 2015), for the summary statistic we use the partial correlation coefficient (PCC), which can be derived as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the given theoretical, empirical or econometric approach, findings of positive relationships between the stock market, banking and economic growth have been consistent (see Valickova et al, 2014). Moreover, Minsky (2005) found that financial crises bring about instability and adverse effects upon economic growth, particularly in developing economies.…”
Section: Literature Review On the Relationship Between Economic Grmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The relevance of the financial sector for economic growth has been studied empirically by analyzing the relationships between banking, stock markets and growth at country levels (Roubini and Sala-i-Martin, 1992;King and Levine, 1993;Levine and Zervos, 1998;Valickova, Havranek and Horvath, 2014), and at industry levels (Rajan and Zingales, 1998;Braun and Larrain, 2005). The studies that include the insurance sector are more recent (among them Webb, Grace and Skipper, 2002;Haiss and Sümegi, 2008;Arena, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent qualitative surveys in the field include [7][8][9]. More recent surveys based on meta-analysis, which include [10,11], uncover the causes of the degree of heterogeneity in the empirical literature, such as the choice of financial variable proxies, the kind of data used (e.g., the number of countries or time periods under investigation) and the research design (e.g., addressing or ignoring the issue of endogeneity).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%