2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial development and standardized reporting: A comparison among developed, emerging, and frontier markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies show that firms listed in countries participating in the Kyoto Protocol on GHG emissions exhibit a higher degree of environmental disclosure (e.g., Freedman and Jaggi, 2011 ; Gallego-Álvarez et al., 2011 ). We selected three macro variables to take into account the national context: country development, which falls into two categories, advanced (code: 1) and emerging (code: 0), following the IMF World Economic Outlook 8 ; country financial development from the World Bank for 2018 (percentage of domestic credit provided by the financial industry to GDP, 9 following Pineiro-Chousa et al., 2019 ); and country EPI, which ranks countries from 0 to 100 on two fundamental dimensions of sustainable development, namely, environmental health and ecosystem vitality. From a stakeholder and legitimacy theory perspective, the more a country is developed (as a whole and financially) and the more the national environmental policy is engaged in fighting against climate change, the more banks should be committed to voluntary carbon disclosure, and we can expect a higher quality of their disclosure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies show that firms listed in countries participating in the Kyoto Protocol on GHG emissions exhibit a higher degree of environmental disclosure (e.g., Freedman and Jaggi, 2011 ; Gallego-Álvarez et al., 2011 ). We selected three macro variables to take into account the national context: country development, which falls into two categories, advanced (code: 1) and emerging (code: 0), following the IMF World Economic Outlook 8 ; country financial development from the World Bank for 2018 (percentage of domestic credit provided by the financial industry to GDP, 9 following Pineiro-Chousa et al., 2019 ); and country EPI, which ranks countries from 0 to 100 on two fundamental dimensions of sustainable development, namely, environmental health and ecosystem vitality. From a stakeholder and legitimacy theory perspective, the more a country is developed (as a whole and financially) and the more the national environmental policy is engaged in fighting against climate change, the more banks should be committed to voluntary carbon disclosure, and we can expect a higher quality of their disclosure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a set of common elements of SR (Watts, 2015) and helps organizations present sustainability reports with better uniformity and comparability across different countries (Kuzey and Uyar, 2017;Simmons et al, 2018). In most emerging economies, the adoption of SR practices is still voluntary and business organizations are yet to understand the importance of such reporting practices (Aboud and Diab, 2018;Md Zaini et al, 2018;Piñeiro-Chousa et al, 2019). However, the adoption of such standardized reporting practices in emerging economy contexts could improve the credibility and acceptance of information to diverse stakeholder groups (Agyei and Yankey, 2019;Kiliç et al, 2016;Manawadu et al, 2019;Wachira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow the growing number of fsQCA applications in business research that use the country as the unit of analysis ( Estevão et al, 2020 , Piñeiro-Chousa et al, 2019 , Tekic and Tekic, 2021 ) and seek to identify configurations of factors that might have helped countries achieve trade resilience over the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%