2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1540027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Disclosure and the Board: A Case for Non-Independent Directors

Abstract: -In listed companies, the Board of directors has ultimate responsibility for information disclosure. The conventional wisdom is that director independence is an essential factor in improving the quality of that disclosure. In a sense, this approach subordinates expertise to independence. We argue that effective certification may require firm-specific expertise, in particular for intangible-intensive business models. However, this latter form of expertise is negatively related to independence as it is commonly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the level of information is not influenced by the quality of corporate governance: specifically, we noted that firm-specific expertise, strictly required in order to identify and control the chain of significant estimates on which an impairment test is based, could be more difficult to obtain for independent directors (Biondi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the level of information is not influenced by the quality of corporate governance: specifically, we noted that firm-specific expertise, strictly required in order to identify and control the chain of significant estimates on which an impairment test is based, could be more difficult to obtain for independent directors (Biondi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%