2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial guarantors’ executive compensation, charter value and risk-taking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Allen, Carletti, Goldstein, and Leonello (2017) challenge this conventional idea by reviewing the role that these underlying assumptions play in the assessment of the desirability and effectiveness of government guarantees; they propose a new framework within which to consider them and conclude that new research is needed to evaluate the implications on banks and the financial system as a whole. Moreover, the literature on principal-agent problem (conflict of interest between the shareholders and the manager) underlines that moral hazard causes the manager (and not the shareholders) to select a high level of risk (see, for instance, Lai, Soumaré, & Sun, 2012). Furthermore, Grosse (2017) reports that most of the large US banks that were bailed out during the financial crisis also forced out their chief executives and usually several other members of top management as a result.…”
Section: Theoretical Papers On Bail-inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allen, Carletti, Goldstein, and Leonello (2017) challenge this conventional idea by reviewing the role that these underlying assumptions play in the assessment of the desirability and effectiveness of government guarantees; they propose a new framework within which to consider them and conclude that new research is needed to evaluate the implications on banks and the financial system as a whole. Moreover, the literature on principal-agent problem (conflict of interest between the shareholders and the manager) underlines that moral hazard causes the manager (and not the shareholders) to select a high level of risk (see, for instance, Lai, Soumaré, & Sun, 2012). Furthermore, Grosse (2017) reports that most of the large US banks that were bailed out during the financial crisis also forced out their chief executives and usually several other members of top management as a result.…”
Section: Theoretical Papers On Bail-inmentioning
confidence: 99%