2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial incentives for breast cancer screening undermine informed choice

Abstract: Differences in estimates reflect the different screening periods, as well as methodological differences (including which trials are deemed sufficiently robust and unbiased). † Estimated that 3.36% of all women screened each year receive a false positive result. ‡ Estimated that the cumulative risk of a false positive result after 10 mammograms is around 20-60%. ¶ Concluded that the results are conflicting but that a false positive result can cause breast cancer specific psychological distress for up to three y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Providing financial rewards or reimbursements to patients who complete recommended breast cancer screening has shown promising results in improving screening rates. These incentives can include gift cards, cash rewards or reductions in healthcare costs associated with screening 33. This study included a financial incentive, the hospital-sponsored free raffle tickets for attendance to a National Football League Buffalo Bills game once patients completed mammogram screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing financial rewards or reimbursements to patients who complete recommended breast cancer screening has shown promising results in improving screening rates. These incentives can include gift cards, cash rewards or reductions in healthcare costs associated with screening 33. This study included a financial incentive, the hospital-sponsored free raffle tickets for attendance to a National Football League Buffalo Bills game once patients completed mammogram screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bartholomew et al raised concerns over the use of financial incentives in breast cancer screening, stating they may stimulate patients to make decisions they would not otherwise make, which can subsequently lead to patient harm (e.g. unnecessary treatment) [ 20 ]. However, the use of financial incentives in the context of our study is quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, malignant tumor has become one of the leading categories of diseases causing vast loss of human life annually. Although a malignant tumor is intrinsically difficult to cure, surgical resection provides a straightforward and effective treatment for most solid tumors. Unfortunately, residual tumor tissues or cells left behind surgery can usually redevelop into solid tumors locally or remotely, leading to tumor recurrence or metastasis which actually accounts for the mortality of most tumors. , On the other hand, surgical resection inevitably causes acute incisional pain, which can evoke both physiological and psychological stresses on patients and impair their postoperative rehabilitation. , To improve the outcome of surgical treatment for malignant solid tumors, there is an urgent and widespread need to resolve the problems of tumor recurrence and postoperative pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%