views expressed in this short article are those of the author and not necessarily the views of the Nepal Rastra Bank. This short note is in response to Saxena (2002), which comments on Maskay (2001) and concludes that there exists 'inconsistency in empirical estimation and conclusions'. As such, this short note responds to the above two comments, puts forth an implication and ends on a reflective note.First, the empirical methodology using VAR is standard practice, thus there should not be any need for elaboration. The crux of the comments seems to be the time series where in Maskay ( 2001) the gross domestic product at constant prices were used, while Saxena (2002) had used the volume of the gross domestic product. While apparently different time series were applied, it is really encouraging that the empirical results are equivalent, as discussed below, and by virtue of their robustness, I would argue that they strengthen the conclusions in Maskay