2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial stability of banks in India: Does liquidity creation matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
11
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it has also shown that PSBs pose a higher systemic risk than the PVBs, which is also evident by the recurring recapitalization of PSBs by the government. The results corroborate the finding that PSBs are financially less stable than PVBs (Gupta and Kashiramka, 2020). Thus, the measure has shown appropriate reliability in the Indian context.…”
Section: Implications Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, it has also shown that PSBs pose a higher systemic risk than the PVBs, which is also evident by the recurring recapitalization of PSBs by the government. The results corroborate the finding that PSBs are financially less stable than PVBs (Gupta and Kashiramka, 2020). Thus, the measure has shown appropriate reliability in the Indian context.…”
Section: Implications Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results further reveal that PSBs predominantly contribute to the capital shortfall in the system, with the top-five SIBs being all PSBs. Thus, these banks are more vulnerable to macroeconomic shocks as overly leveraged banks are more sensitive to turbulence (Gupta and Kashiramka, 2020). These results conform to the findings of highlighting that government-owned banks are more susceptible during the crisis vis-à-vis the PVBs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…More buffer means reduced bank collapse risk (Inoune et al, 2006 ). It is also possible that as a result of the economic cycle, banks maintain a procyclical buffer, reducing it during times of expansion and raising it during recessions (Alan et al 2009 ), thereby magnifying the loop and hence escalating financial stress risks (Gupta and Kashiramka, 2020 ; Nair and Anand, 2020 ). Similarly, climate risks and climate change mitigation are taken as other variables of study which are operationalized in the study model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding financial regulation, Batuo et al (2018) confirmed that it can increase stability. Subsequently, authors such as Anarfo et al (2020), Damjanovic et al (2020), Gupta and Kashiramka (2020), and Igan and Mirzaei (2020) converge in their studies when they proffer that financial regulation increases bank resilience by improving asset quality, as well as inhibiting unsustainable bank credit growth and preventing financial instability. Contrarily, Anarfo et al (2020) evidenced that financial regulation reduces financial inclusion in Sub-Saharan African countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, financial regulation, namely capital adequacy requirement, is a measure used to ensure the financial stability of banks, which reduces unsustainable bank credit growth. Several scientific studies state that financial regulation is a strong barrier to financial inclusion (Anarfo et al 2020;Gupta and Kashiramka 2020;Igan and Mirzaei 2020). Scientific studies often use indicators such as the concentration of the top five banks (C5), Panzar-Rosse H-statistic, Lerner Index, and Boone Index, to measure competitiveness (Albaity et al 2019;Goetz 2018;Owen and Pereira 2018).…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%