2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2881718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financing Climate Policies through Climate Bonds A Three Stage Model and Empirics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Scenario 1 presents business-as-usual (BAU). 15 In this case, no attempt is made toward mitigation, and 14 In our modeling procedure, we pursue simplified versions. We want to elaborate on transparent and simple scenarios and policy options, and thus we will abstain from detailed functional specifications and calibrations, as, for example, undertaken in the Nordhaus DICE model.…”
Section: Three Scenarios For the Climate Policy MIXmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 Scenario 1 presents business-as-usual (BAU). 15 In this case, no attempt is made toward mitigation, and 14 In our modeling procedure, we pursue simplified versions. We want to elaborate on transparent and simple scenarios and policy options, and thus we will abstain from detailed functional specifications and calibrations, as, for example, undertaken in the Nordhaus DICE model.…”
Section: Three Scenarios For the Climate Policy MIXmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We want to elaborate on transparent and simple scenarios and policy options, and thus we will abstain from detailed functional specifications and calibrations, as, for example, undertaken in the Nordhaus DICE model. 15 The solution procedure that we use in this modeling is nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC). As described in Gruene GHG levels increase indefinitely.…”
Section: Three Scenarios For the Climate Policy MIXmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first option could consist of issuing "debt for investment" reserved to residents to avoid or limit speculative capital flows (Koo, 2011;Fazi and Iodice, 2016). A more radical option would be debt financing through "perpetual bonds" (Flaherty et al, 2016;Sachs, 2014), particularly suitable for financing long-term projects such as those linked to the energy transition; this would de facto constitute a debt monetization. Flaherthy et al (2016) noted that the acceptance of these securities as collateral by the central banks would make them desirable even if the market return on investment was lower than the social return.…”
Section: Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy In Secular Stagnationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Une première option pourrait consister en l'émission d'une « dette pour l'investissement » réservée aux résidents, pour éviter ou limiter les flux de capitaux spéculatifs (Fazi et Iodice, 2016 ;Koo, 2011). Une option plus radicale serait le financement par des « titres perpétuels » (Flaherty et al, 2016 ;Sachs, 2014), particulièrement indiqués pour financer la transition énergétique, qui permettrait en fait une monétisation de facto de la dette. Flaherthy et al (2016) remarquent que l'acceptation de ces titres comme collatéral par les banques centrales les rendrait désirables même si le rendement de marché des investissements était inférieur au rendement social.…”
Section: Repenser La Politique Macroéconomique En Stagnation Séculaireunclassified