2011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1271116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finanzierung und finanzielle Probleme von Leistungen und Strukturen im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe im Jahr 2011 – DRG-System und stationäre Versorgung inklusive Urogynäkologie und benigner wie auch maligner gynäkologischer Operationen

Abstract: Die öffentliche Diskussion über die Finanzierung des Gesundheitswesens in Deutschland besitzt für das Fach Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe erhebliche Bedeutung. Der vorliegende 2. Teil der Publikation der Finanzierungskommission in der DGGG e. V. stellt weitere wesentliche aktuelle Finanzierungsaspekte bzw. Finanzierungsprobleme dar, welche unser Fachgebiet betreffen. Unter anderem werden die Eingaben in das DRG-System unseres Fachbereichs näher beleuchtet. Hier fällt weiterhin eine Über-und Unterrepräsentation m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown previously in several publications that care for patients with breast carcinoma in certified breast cancer centres is not at present adequately remunerated and that additional charges are needed in order to cover costs in certified structures [9,10,11,12]. One of the major problems is that certain costs do not qualify for remuneration.…”
Section: From the Point Of View Of The Certified Breast Cancer Centresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown previously in several publications that care for patients with breast carcinoma in certified breast cancer centres is not at present adequately remunerated and that additional charges are needed in order to cover costs in certified structures [9,10,11,12]. One of the major problems is that certain costs do not qualify for remuneration.…”
Section: From the Point Of View Of The Certified Breast Cancer Centresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So over the last decade economic aspects have become an integral and non-negligible part of the treatment process and are repeatedly addressed by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) [2,42]. As a consequence hospitals and breast centers have to analyze costs and reimbursements and adjust them accordingly to avoid potential losses which are not covered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…manipulators and morcellators) and case-related accessories. In this case "high-tech" and "high-cost" are both to the benefit of the patient [56]. From an ethical perspective, laparoscopy is associated with the least physical trauma, the lowest level of analgesia consumption and the shorter inpatient stay and can therefore not be rejected [54,57,58].…”
Section: Surgical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one raises the question of fairness in the DRG system from the point of view of the extent to which the higher outlay for more patient-friendly (since they are minimally invasive) procedures is covered, the problem only really becomes apparent when one compares the reimbursement price for a hysterectomy (N21Z) of € 3380.57 with that of an organ-preserving myoma nucleation procedure, which is frequently more surgically intensive, of € 2992.44. At least it must be established that the DRG system does not a priori encourage organ-preserving procedures [56].…”
Section: Surgical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%