“…A distractor or nontargets that are in the same hemisphere as the target will reduce distractor processing compared to a distractor or nontargets in different hemispheres (Torralbo & Beck, 2008;Wei, Kang, & Zhou, 2013). An infrequently presented onset distractor leads to significant distraction processing while a frequently presented one does not (Cosman & Vecera, 2010), and both perceptual grouping and the salience of a target relative to the distractor and/or the other stimuli in a display affect the degree of distractor processing (Baylis & Driver, 1992;Biggs & Gibson, 2013;Biggs, Kreager, & Davoli, 2015;Eltiti, Wallas, & Fox, 2005;Yeh & Lin, 2013;Yeshurun & Marciano, 2013). These and other empirical findings Biggs & Gibson, 2010;Chen & Chan, 2007;Wilson et al, 2011;Yeh, Lee, Chen, & Chen, 2014 ), together with the conceptual and methodological issues raised by a number of researchers (see Benoni & Tsal, 2013;Giesbrecht, Sy, Bundesen, & Kyllingsbaek, 2014;and Murphy, Groeger, & Greene, 2016, for reviews), indicate that the simple principles of PLT do not fully capture the complex interactions among targets and nontargets in complex stimulus arrays.…”