2012
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20148818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding a Petro-elastic Model Suitable for Sim2seis Calculation

Abstract: The petro-elastic model (PEM) is a necessary step in simulator to seismic modelling, intended to close the loop between the seismic and engineering domains. In this work, we discuss some fundamental issues within the conventional PEM algorithm, not commonly covered by published literature. Firstly, we explain the importance of the porosity rock model for the PEM. It is shown that both total/effective porosity models are able to generate satisfactory seismic results, provided that the density and bulk/shear mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synthetic seismic acoustic impedance data are created using a "true" petro-elastic model based on the Gassmann's equations [26,62], the Hashin-Shtrikman bound models [27] for a mixture of sands and shales, and the fluid and mineral parameters proposed for the Norne Field [12]. For the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds, we assume that the volume of shale in each of the active cells in the model is given by 1-NTG [3]. The true PEM Fig.…”
Section: Norne Field Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic seismic acoustic impedance data are created using a "true" petro-elastic model based on the Gassmann's equations [26,62], the Hashin-Shtrikman bound models [27] for a mixture of sands and shales, and the fluid and mineral parameters proposed for the Norne Field [12]. For the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds, we assume that the volume of shale in each of the active cells in the model is given by 1-NTG [3]. The true PEM Fig.…”
Section: Norne Field Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical computation determines that an offset of 9 km and frequency of 0.2 Hz gives an optimal response for the particular reservoir and overburden structure under consideration. For comparative purposes, seismic modelling is also performed on the same model using the work of Amini et al (2012), which incorporates a calibrated petroelastic model for the reservoir and convolutional modelling to generate a seismic data volume.…”
Section: The Composite Resistivity Of Rock and Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Salako et al (2012) considered a practical simulator to CSEM tool driven by the 1D dipole method of Key (2009), which also accounted for variable net-to-gross in the reservoir. This permitted a direct comparison with simulator to seismic methods, (described by Amini et al, 2012), regarding the relative sensitivities of water saturation detection, particularly in the presence of variable reservoir thickness, net-to-gross and porosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%