Advances in Arthropod Repellents 2022
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-85411-5.00001-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding a repellent against ticks: neurophysiological and behavioral approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…categorized repellency into five categories; (1) true/spatial repellents (orient away from the source without direct contact), (2) contact irritancy/excito‐repellency/landing inhibition (orient away from source after direct contact), (3) odor masking (reduction of the attractiveness of host or disruption of the location of the host through masking effect), (4) visual masking (reduction of the attractiveness of host or disruption of the location of the host through masking effect), and (5) antifeedant/deterrence (feeding activity disrupted by contact or ingestion of a chemical). Physiological detection mechanisms, chemical concentrations, experimental conditions, and additional experimental variables all contribute to the insect's response, making it difficult to compare results among different studies on different species 14,15 . Despite a broad characterization of the behavioral responses of arthropods towards pyrethroids, many reports focus on mosquitoes or other disease vectors, typically capable of flight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…categorized repellency into five categories; (1) true/spatial repellents (orient away from the source without direct contact), (2) contact irritancy/excito‐repellency/landing inhibition (orient away from source after direct contact), (3) odor masking (reduction of the attractiveness of host or disruption of the location of the host through masking effect), (4) visual masking (reduction of the attractiveness of host or disruption of the location of the host through masking effect), and (5) antifeedant/deterrence (feeding activity disrupted by contact or ingestion of a chemical). Physiological detection mechanisms, chemical concentrations, experimental conditions, and additional experimental variables all contribute to the insect's response, making it difficult to compare results among different studies on different species 14,15 . Despite a broad characterization of the behavioral responses of arthropods towards pyrethroids, many reports focus on mosquitoes or other disease vectors, typically capable of flight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological detection mechanisms, chemical concentrations, experimental conditions, and additional experimental variables all contribute to the insect's response, making it difficult to compare results among different studies on different species. 14,15 Despite a broad characterization of the behavioral responses of arthropods towards pyrethroids, many reports focus on mosquitoes or other disease vectors, typically capable of flight. While urban pests, such as the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.), have been evaluated for their behavioral responses to pyrethroids, most assays focus exclusively on endpoint data, with no or limited information on real-time movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%