2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Correspondences Between Images using Descriptors and Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While such techniques have been extensively used over the last decades, they suffer from high computational complexity and are not suitable for large images, which are common in remote sensing in general and planetary science in particular. An alternative is to conduct matching in a transformation space, employing techniques such as shearlet transform [28], wavelet transform [45], and radon transform [46]. However, in this case, the gain in computational efficiency is attenuated by the inability to model complex geometric deformations, which are generally present in remote sensing images.…”
Section: B Abstraction Level Used For Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While such techniques have been extensively used over the last decades, they suffer from high computational complexity and are not suitable for large images, which are common in remote sensing in general and planetary science in particular. An alternative is to conduct matching in a transformation space, employing techniques such as shearlet transform [28], wavelet transform [45], and radon transform [46]. However, in this case, the gain in computational efficiency is attenuated by the inability to model complex geometric deformations, which are generally present in remote sensing images.…”
Section: B Abstraction Level Used For Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, planetary images that map the same area at different times may be exposed to geometric and photometric differences that cannot be necessarily modeled. A systematic planetary coregistration algorithm should therefore take into account the presence of this "spatial noise," thus avoiding rigid geometric models, such as those based upon rotation-scaling-translation and affine transformations (see [37], [54], [46]).…”
Section: Limited Knowledge Of Planetary Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's mainly used in three-dimensional reconstruction tasks. The algorithm is compared with RANSAC [49]. Sanromà Et al.…”
Section: Group-wise Image Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%