Finding Difference in Emotional Communities: New Feminisms of Women's Lives in the Nineteenth Centuryceand Sixth Millenniumbce

Abstract

This paper explores notions of relationality and emotional communities to re-tell accounts of women's lives in the nineteenth century ce and second half of the sixth millennium bce, within the framework of posthumanist feminism. We argue that in both of these contexts women's work, spaces and material cultures have been devalued in comparison with those categorized as masculine. To counter androcentric accounts, we consider how different tasks and forms of material culture can create ‘emotional communities’ among groups, forming shared participation in social worlds. Our focus is first the mourning cultures of the Victorian period in the UK, where we argue objects of emotion may have operated to create shared spaces outside of the home, breaking down oppositions of domestic and private. Second, we turn to the ways in which tasks considered female have been downplayed in the Neolithic of central Europe, exploring the assemblages of bodies, grinding stones and hide working to show how emotional currents may have flowed through these materials, creating experiences of aging and different forms of prestige. In conclusion, we argue that the concept of emotional communities provides a useful methodology to answer the challenge set by posthumanist feminism of thinking difference as positive.

Rational Choice Practices for Village Women as MSMEs in Kediri Regency in Improving the Family Economy

“…This condition seems to want to explain that in spite of being in the public sector the role of women is only in matters that are closely related to their position in the domestic sector. For example, people think that because women are not leaders in the private sector, they are not fit to lead, let alone have power because they do not have the ability in that field (Morris & Bickle, 2022). In this case, the household is an example, and women can only take care of the kitchen and manage spending money for the family automatically when they are in community organizations.…”

Mapping collaborations: working in the contact zone of posthumanism and gender archaeology

“…Archaeologists have recently argued for posthumanist thinking as a profound new opening for gender and feminist archaeology (Bickle, 2020;Cobb and Crellin, 2022;Fredengren, 2021;Morris and Bickle, 2022;O'Dell and Harris, 2022;Robb and Harris, 2018). Others have made critical points about what posthumanism cannot, or at least has not, done for the study of past human lives in their gendered, classed, empowered and suffering diversity (Barrett, 2022;Díaz de Liaño and Fernández-Götz, 2021;Eriksen and Kay, 2022;Pollock, 2016;Van Dyke, 2021).…”