2011 Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Analytic Algorithmics and Combinatorics (ANALCO) 2011
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611973013.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Hidden Cliques in Linear Time with High Probability

Abstract: We are given a graph G with n vertices, where a random subset of k vertices has been made into a clique, and the remaining edges are chosen independently with probability 1 2 . This random graph model is denoted G(n, 1 2 , k). The hidden clique problem is to design an algorithm that finds the k-clique in polynomial time with high probability. An algorithm due to Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov uses spectral techniques to find the hidden clique with high probability when k = c √ n for a sufficiently large constan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The randomized mapping from A to X is as follows. By (18), N is even, and let N 2 = N/2 = pℓ and [N ] \ [N 2 ] = {N 2 + 1, . .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The randomized mapping from A to X is as follows. By (18), N is even, and let N 2 = N/2 = pℓ and [N ] \ [N 2 ] = {N 2 + 1, . .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] and [7] for the general framework as well as application areas motivating such questions and see [2] and [12] for a number of interesting general results in these contexts. In the context of the combinatorics, such questions result in the famous planted clique problem see e.g [5,15] and the references therein.…”
Section: Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the subdifferential of the nuclear norm atX is equal to the set ∂ X * = {vv T /k + W : Wv = W Tv = 0, W ≤ 1}; see [48,Example 2]. Combining (36) and (37) and substituting this formula for the subgradients of X * into the resulting equation yields (18) and (19). Thus, the conditions (18), (19), (20), (21), and (22) are exactly the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions for (6) applied at (X,Ȳ ), with the Lagrange multiplier M 2 taken to be 0.…”
Section: A Appendicesmentioning
confidence: 99%