2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Knowledge Gaps in Aerobic Granulation Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
57
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Efforts have been made to develop a predictable granulation process by shifting engineering parameters such as shear force, selection pressure, substrate concentration, reactor configuration, among others . However, studies have shown variations in granules formation time, size and settleability characteristics (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efforts have been made to develop a predictable granulation process by shifting engineering parameters such as shear force, selection pressure, substrate concentration, reactor configuration, among others . However, studies have shown variations in granules formation time, size and settleability characteristics (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have been made to develop a predictable granulation process by shifting engineering parameters such as shear force, selection pressure, substrate concentration, reactor configuration, among others. 19 However, studies have shown variations in granules formation time, size and settleability characteristics (Table 3). Previous studies have showed that granules cultivated with domestic wastewater in pilot-and full-scale systems achieved similar diameter sizes of approximately 0.3 mm, 1,20,21 while granules from synthetic influent are cultivated more rapidly and achieved larger sizes with better settling ability.…”
Section: Aerobic Granule Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to high COD/TP ratio in the bioreactor, in which glycogen-accumulating organisms are encouraged to accumulate in sludge. 7 The glycogen-accumulating organisms are considered as carbon competitors for polyphosphate-accumulating organisms because of their anaerobically organic carbon uptake in the same manner as polyphosphate-accumulating organisms perform, without PO 4 3− conversion. The process showed an increasing trend of TP removal after increasing the operation time to 24 h (phase II), during which AGSBR could use up 99% of P-constituents (TP in effluent was below 1 mg L −1 ).…”
Section: Phosphorus Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional nitrification and denitrification processes using activated sludge systems are not able to efficiently remove nitrogen and phosphorus. 4 Furthermore, the processes are very cost-intensive due to land area requirements, high aeration rates and external carbon sources for denitrification. Therefore, in order to improve the existing methods, downstream treatment processes such as biological nutrients removal are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation