2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding low autocorrelation binary sequences with memetic algorithms

Abstract: This paper deals with the construction of binary sequences with low autocorrelation, a very hard problem with many practical applications. The paper analyzes several metaheuristic approaches to tackle this kind of sequences. More specifically, the paper provides an analysis of different local search strategies, used as standalone techniques and embedded within memetic algorithms. One of our proposals, namely a memetic algorithm endowed with a Tabu Search local searcher, performs at the state-of-the-art, as it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While branch and bound solvers, for both even and odd sequences [18] and for skew-symmetric sequences only [20] have been pursued, they do not scale as well as the stochastic solvers. Stochastic solvers cannot prove optimality, they can only be compared on the basis of the best-value solutions, and to a limited extent, also on the average runtime needed to find such solutions under a sufficiently large number of repeated trials [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The experimental results obtained with our stochastic solver lssOrel are compared to the instrumented versions of solvers in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While branch and bound solvers, for both even and odd sequences [18] and for skew-symmetric sequences only [20] have been pursued, they do not scale as well as the stochastic solvers. Stochastic solvers cannot prove optimality, they can only be compared on the basis of the best-value solutions, and to a limited extent, also on the average runtime needed to find such solutions under a sufficiently large number of repeated trials [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The experimental results obtained with our stochastic solver lssOrel are compared to the instrumented versions of solvers in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the code by the author 2 to generate the sequences for the method [19] as well as to deblur the images. The number of random Method TIME (seconds) Raskar et al [19] (N s =10 6 ) 268.06 Raskar et al [19] (N s =10 8 ) 26779.90 Proposed 0.21 Table 1: Average computational times for generating binary sequences. The computational time of the method [19] depends on the number of samples, while the proposed method requires much shorter time for all sequence lengths.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they rely on a randomized linear search that only considers min[log(|F(U )|)] in Eq. (6). To deal with this issue, we find a solution that would take both terms into account and return the maximum coded factor F C .…”
Section: Modified Legendre Sequence For Coded Exposurementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stochastic methods were introduced to solve this problem [10] [12]. In the beginning, even these methods failed to produce proper outputs.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%