2021
DOI: 10.1002/net.22057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding minimum label spanning trees using cross‐entropy method

Abstract: Obtaining high-quality solutions to the minimum label spanning tree problem is of crucial importance to efficient communication network design, since such solutions can reduce both the construction cost and the complexity of the ultimate architecture. However, the corresponding optimization task was shown to be hard even for complete graphs. As a consequence, no computationally efficient method for solving this problem exactly in a reasonable time is known to exist and one has to rely on approximation techniqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Silva et al [9] proposed a compact binary integer programming model to solve GMLSTP, in [10] the authors introduced a mixed-integer linear program (MIP) formulation for MLSTP and applied the capacity of exploration of a new local search method based on MIP to find results. Other evolutionary algorithms included the Simulated Annealing and Reactive Tabu Search [11], the Ant Colony Optimization [12], firefly algorithm [13], multi-objective optimization [14], cross-entropy method [15], etc.…”
Section: Algorithms For the Sgmlstp And Its Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silva et al [9] proposed a compact binary integer programming model to solve GMLSTP, in [10] the authors introduced a mixed-integer linear program (MIP) formulation for MLSTP and applied the capacity of exploration of a new local search method based on MIP to find results. Other evolutionary algorithms included the Simulated Annealing and Reactive Tabu Search [11], the Ant Colony Optimization [12], firefly algorithm [13], multi-objective optimization [14], cross-entropy method [15], etc.…”
Section: Algorithms For the Sgmlstp And Its Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational experiments show that the MSLB outperforms the state-of-the-art metaheuristics with respect to optimality and processing times. In [32], Vaisman proposes a new method to solve the MLSTP called the cross-entropy method, which relies on rigorous developments in the fields of information theory and stochastic simulation. Experimentations indicate that the proposed algorithm can obtain optimal or near-optimal solutions while using a reasonable computational time.…”
Section: Classical Labeled Problems In Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silva et al [9] proposed a compact binary integer programming model to solve the GMLSTP, in [10] the authors introduced a mixed-integer linear program (MIP) formulation for the MLSTP and applied the capacity of exploration of a new local search method based on MIP to find results. Other evolutionary algorithms included the Simulated Annealing and Reactive Tabu Search [11], the Ant Colony Optimization [12], firefly algorithm [13], multi-objective optimization [14], cross-entropy method [15], etc. Heuristic algorithms show better performance in finding the MLST [1], Chwatal and Raidl [16] abstracted the MLSTP and the GMLSTP with the mixed integer programming, They have also proposed several cuts to strengthen the models and implemented branch-and-cut and branch-and-cut-and-price algorithms to search feasible MLST solutions; Cerrone et al [17] applied carousel greedy to solve the MLSTP problem; In [18] the authors introduced a single-commodity flow mathematical formulation that perfectly represents the MLST and the SGMLST, and proposed three greedy algorithms, namely MMVCA (multi-label MVCA), MMVCA extended with CG(Constructive Greedy), and CG with the Pilot Method, to search promising solutions.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Algorithms For the Sgmlstp And Its Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%