2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3579758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Missing Links in Complex Networks: A Multiple‐Attribute Decision‐Making Method

Abstract: Link prediction, which aims to forecast potential or missing links in a complex network based on currently observed information, has drawn growing attention from researchers. To date, a host of similarity-based methods have been put forward. Usually, one method harbors the idea that one similarity measure is applicable to various networks, and thus has performance fluctuation on different networks. In this paper, we propose a novel method to solve this issue by regarding link prediction as a multiple-attribute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, on most of networks, Precision shows downward trend when the size of L increases. This is because that with the increasing of L, the probability to uncover relevant items will decrease, and then the value of Precision will lower [22].…”
Section: B Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, on most of networks, Precision shows downward trend when the size of L increases. This is because that with the increasing of L, the probability to uncover relevant items will decrease, and then the value of Precision will lower [22].…”
Section: B Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…higher similarity score are more likely to be linked [12], [22]. To compute the similarity score of a pair of nodes, a straightforward strategy is to count the number of shared neighbors of these two nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve similarity indices are introduced in Section 2.2 , among which each index exploits one or two structural features of networks [ 36 ]. The fusion of these indices can incorporate multiple structural features to improve prediction performance.…”
Section: Proposed Framework: Rf-rfe-sellpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the AHP method is more suitable for such a situation. It is exploited for defining the weight of each criterion using the pair-wise comparison [20]. The process of this model is mainly based on different steps: The first step consists of structuring the decision hierarchy considering the essential objective of the study and determining the criteria and subcriteria.…”
Section: Multicriteria Decision Analysis (Mcda)mentioning
confidence: 99%