2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/socialcom.2010.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Overlapping Communities in Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think deploying social sentiment to play a central role in producing recommendations is still rarely explored and therefore entails our work. Last but not least, community formation and detection is also closely related to the field of SNS interacting with recommendation systems ( [10], [11], and [23]). …”
Section: Data From Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think deploying social sentiment to play a central role in producing recommendations is still rarely explored and therefore entails our work. Last but not least, community formation and detection is also closely related to the field of SNS interacting with recommendation systems ( [10], [11], and [23]). …”
Section: Data From Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static communities are then analyzed to detect evolutionary behavior. Specifically, the communities are discovered using LOS clustering [13] and evolutions with an F (·) value above 0.2 were taken to be valid. Both networks resulted in about 50,000 evolutions.…”
Section: Determining Communities and Evolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we need a community fitness function in order to quantify the similarity between a node u and a neighbor community C. We find the fitness function F S = |S in | 2|S in |+|S out | (where S ⊆ V ) commonly used in [11] [14][17] performs competitively in both synthesized and real-world datasets.…”
Section: Revisiting Unassigned Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the non-overlapping point of view, a (overlaped) community should be local and independent of its context or topological environment, as proposed in a recent work [10]. In addition, Goldberg [11] suggests that a community should also satisfy connectedness, i.e., it should induce a connected sub-graph in the network, and local optimality, i.e., the removal or addition of a single node will not affect the community with respect to a density function. While we agree upon the independence and connectedness properties, we find the local optimality too strict to allow the extension of network communities, especially when they can overlap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%