2021
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.639435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Satisfaction in Belonging: Preservice Teacher Subjective Well-Being and its Relationship to Belonging, Trust, and Self-Efficacy

Abstract: The well-being of teachers and preservice teachers has been a topic extensively explored through the lens of burnout and stress. Despite its manifold benefits, few studies have explored PST well-being through the lens of subjective well-being. Grounding our study in positive psychology, we explore the relationships between preservice teachers’ subjective well-being, program sense of belonging, relational trust, and self-efficacy. Our participants included 63 multiple- and single-subject preservice teachers in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
(248 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings show collaboration was strongly associated with wellbeing, which may be explained due to collaboration being linked to learning (Webb et al, 2009;Bjorklund et al, 2021), meaningful work (Shirley et al, 2020), and teacher self-efficacy (Leithwood., 2006;Voelkel and Chrispeels, 2017). Meaning, learning, growth, and accomplishment are dimensions of several models of wellbeing (Ryff, 1989;Seligman., 2011;Huppert and So, 2013;Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand, 2015), so if these dimensions are increased due to collaboration this would have an overall positive effect on wellbeing.…”
Section: Organizational Level Factors (Hypothesis 5)mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings show collaboration was strongly associated with wellbeing, which may be explained due to collaboration being linked to learning (Webb et al, 2009;Bjorklund et al, 2021), meaningful work (Shirley et al, 2020), and teacher self-efficacy (Leithwood., 2006;Voelkel and Chrispeels, 2017). Meaning, learning, growth, and accomplishment are dimensions of several models of wellbeing (Ryff, 1989;Seligman., 2011;Huppert and So, 2013;Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand, 2015), so if these dimensions are increased due to collaboration this would have an overall positive effect on wellbeing.…”
Section: Organizational Level Factors (Hypothesis 5)mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our findings add to the literature that generalized trust, trust in work colleagues, and collaborative environments are associated with subjective wellbeing and job satisfaction ( Helliwell and Wang, 2010 ; Schneider et al, 2013 ; Di Fabio, 2017 ). In particular, we add to the literature that educator’s trust in their colleagues is associated with higher levels of wellbeing ( Bjorklund et al, 2021 ) in addition to reducing their levels of burnout, anxiety, and depression ( Van Maele and Van Houtte, 2015 ; Yin et al, 2018 ; Huang et al, 2019 ). One reason for this may be because trust engenders prosocial behaviors, such as cooperation and altruism, that enhance wellbeing ( Kramer, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study may contribute to the knowledge base regarding university teachers' job satisfaction as we address the prevalent issues in the university context. In this era of dramatic societal changes and competition surrounding university teachers, teaching self-efficacy is the key to determining teacher well-being and job satisfaction (Zakariya, 2020;Bjorklund et al, 2021;Kong, 2021;Saks et al, 2021;Toropova et al, 2021), engagement (Al' Abri et al, 2022, and retaining with high quality and effectiveness (You, 2014;Madigan and Kim, 2021). The study findings provide evidence-based information regarding the current trends and underlying psychological reasons for university teachers' dissatisfaction, burnout, and turnover, which might be useful for educators, university administrators, and policymakers framing policy and institutional decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that teaching self-efficacy is associated with positive outcomes, such as teacher well-being (Bjorklund et al, 2021;Saks et al, 2021;Jaguaco et al, 2022;Song, 2022), quality of working life (Kong, 2021;Jaguaco et al, 2022;Matos et al, 2022), and job satisfaction (Chan et al, 2020;Zakariya, 2020), the present study aims to investigate a mediating role of college teaching selfefficacy (CTSE) as a mechanism underlying the relationship between job stress and job satisfaction. We further examined the effect of contextual variables such as gender, teaching experiences, ranks, and teaching loads to forge an understanding of the relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study may contribute to the knowledge base regarding university teachers' job satisfaction as we address the prevalent issues in the university context. In this era of dramatic societal changes and competition surrounding university teachers, teaching self-efficacy is the key to determining teacher well-being and job satisfaction (Zakariya, 2020;Bjorklund et al, 2021;Kong, 2021;Saks et al, 2021;, engagement (Al' Abri et al, 2022), and retaining with high quality and effectiveness (You, 2014;Madigan and Kim, 2021). The study findings provide evidence-based information regarding the current trends and underlying psychological reasons for university teachers' dissatisfaction, burnout, and turnover, which might be useful for educators, university administrators, and policymakers framing policy and institutional decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%