2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-013-0141-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding the invisible smelt: using experimental archaeology to critically evaluate fieldwork methods applied to bloomery iron production remains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of experimental smelting depends on its purpose (Birch et al 2015;Juleff 1996Juleff , 1998Killick 2001). Many experiments offer participants an experience that creates appreciation for past technological practices and the ability to ask more informed questions.…”
Section: Why Experimental Iron Smelting?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of experimental smelting depends on its purpose (Birch et al 2015;Juleff 1996Juleff , 1998Killick 2001). Many experiments offer participants an experience that creates appreciation for past technological practices and the ability to ask more informed questions.…”
Section: Why Experimental Iron Smelting?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vigliotti et al (2003) show that magnetic susceptibility, as well as other magnetic properties of marine sediment west of Elba Island, are enriched in layers dating to the ancient smelting period on Elba. Mighall, Foster, Crew, Chapman, and Finn (2009) conclude that magnetic susceptibility helps to detect ore remains and furnace dust (at least in peat records); i.a., Powell, McDonnell, Batt, and Vernon (2008) and Birch, Scholger, Walach, Stremke, and Cech (2015) state that a magnetic susceptibility is a valuable tool for identifying iron smelting activities on sites. Because of the more pronounced pattern of As in corelogging data compared to homogenized samples of the <2 mm sieve separate, we assume that the enrichment of arsenic is mainly related to the presence of (coarse) slag fragments (cf.…”
Section: Sedimentary Smelting Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After realising that all evidence of a series of smelting experiments could apparently be lost over a very short time period, Birch et al (2013) designed a series of experiments in order to develop a more reliable means of recognising sites of iron production and working. Similar to Chu et al (2013), they conclude that it is important to consider micro-residues in conjunction with more traditional, macro-scale, excavation methods, so that disturbed processing sites are not overlooked, and distinctions can be made between domestic and non-domestic processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Chu et al (2013), they conclude that it is important to consider micro-residues in conjunction with more traditional, macro-scale, excavation methods, so that disturbed processing sites are not overlooked, and distinctions can be made between domestic and non-domestic processes. Birch et al (2013) suggest that further experiments could include micromorphology and chemical analyses of sediments, and this is the approach Banerjea et al (2013) have taken to understand the use of space within a settlement. They used micromorphology techniques as well as field methods to analyse deposits from areas of known activities within reconstructed settlements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation