2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding the Return Path: Landmark Position Effects and the Influence of Perspective

Abstract: Much research has been done on how people find their way from one place to another. Compared to that, there is less research available on how people find back from the destination to their origin. We first present theoretical approaches to perceptual and cognitive processes involved in finding a return path, including concepts, such as visibility, structural salience, and allocentric versus egocentric perspective, followed by a series of three experiments. In these experiments, we presented subjects intersecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(92 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, there was no significant difference in performance between the forward and reverse directions for those who learned from a map, suggesting that this type of learning input made it easier for them to retrace their steps to a starting point. Those who learned the route from navigation were less accurate in retracing the route in reverse than when they repeated the route in the direction learned after a delay (consistent with studies in young adults showing that they had more difficulty retracing their steps than reproducing a route in the same direction as they had previously learned; Karimpur, Roeser, & Hamburger, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…On the other hand, there was no significant difference in performance between the forward and reverse directions for those who learned from a map, suggesting that this type of learning input made it easier for them to retrace their steps to a starting point. Those who learned the route from navigation were less accurate in retracing the route in reverse than when they repeated the route in the direction learned after a delay (consistent with studies in young adults showing that they had more difficulty retracing their steps than reproducing a route in the same direction as they had previously learned; Karimpur, Roeser, & Hamburger, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Route retracing is a spatio-cognitive operation that has been theoretically differentiated from route repetition (Karimpur et al, 2016;Passini et al, 1995;Rainville et al, 2001). In this study, we sought to identify the cognitive mechanisms involved in this task and to better understand the strategy used in a specific population of elderly subjects, in whom contradictory results have been observed when T A B L E 5 Performance in the 13 cognitive tests and 16 measures (mean and SD) of the population (total), according to the return route performance (low-performer and high-performer groups) (Nasreddine et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…performing this task. Furthermore, to our knowledge, the few studies that have focused on route retracing in the elderly (Allison & Head, 2017;Barrash, 1994;Karimpur et al, 2016;Wiener et al, 2012Wiener et al, , 2019;…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a wide individual difference in this ability, due to several internal (e.g., gender, familiarity; spatial skills; personal attributes) and/or external (e.g., degree of landmarks differentiation; emotional landmark; environmental layout complexity; continuous environmental changes) factors (e.g., [1][2][3][4]). In particular, human beings use landmarks, the focus of the present paper (monuments, salient objects or buildings stand out from the environment), to spatial re-orient themselves [5][6][7]. In landmark-based navigation, subjects process the exact spatial relationship between environmental objects (landmarks) and themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%