Findings and methodologies about student networks, learning, performance and academic achievement in higher education: A literature review on quantitative studies

Abstract

University student networks are recognised to be linked with student performance. Yet, no literature review seems to address student networks together with student learning or achievement. This paper focuses on the quantitative studies conducted since 2000 that relate to this issue. This literature review highlights five research domains: (1) the links between student and peer performance within face‐to‐face networks; (2) the effects of networks’ components (e.g., centrality) on student learning and achievement within face‐to‐face networks; (3) the impacts of online social network use on student performance; (4) the effects of social presence and of interactions within e‐learning; and (5) the effects of e‐learning networks components. This literature review underlines inconsistent findings within each of these research domains. This paper leads to a discussion on the methodological issues that might explain these inconsistencies and to research questions still to be covered when studying student networks in relation with education outcomes. Rationale for this study Academic success is not to be taken for granted. There is a need for understanding why some students succeed and others fail at university. Many studies focused on the relationships between achievement at university and student networks. To this day, no literature review exists regarding those links. Furthermore, in social networks analysis (SNA), scientists developed quantitative methodologies to describe networks. SNA techniques include, for instance, computing nodes’ centrality. There is a need to discuss how such quantitative methodologies are and could be implemented in education research. Why the new findings matter This knowledge about relationships between college students’ networks and learning, performance or academic achievement should help develop and implement policies that promote student success at university. Implications for educational researchers and policy makers Education researchers have to be cautious about some methodological challenges encountered when studying networks. Also, alternative centrality measures—that is, those less investigated or not investigated—might be valid candidates for representing the importance of students within networks.With respect to educational policy development: Mixing student abilities within classes appears to be a better option than grouping those abilities, but student prior performance has to be taken into account, as linked to the student type that would most benefit from heterogeneity of performance; Educational practitioners should ensure the sharing and dissemination of relevant and accurate resources and information in student (online) networks; We encourage education professionals to analyse how one might effectively integrate online social platforms into instruction, and to educate students about the adverse effects of misusing these platforms; We recommend education practitioners pay attention to students’ isolation feelings in e‐learning settings; In e‐learning settings, e...

Assessing the effects of negotiating leadership skills and conflict resolution on student achievement in Zhejiang Province, China: A structural equation modeling approach

“…Liem, et al [51], assert that students who exhibit more efficient learning strategies have an elevated degree of motivation, hence enhancing their capacity to effectively participate in task completion and attain their intended goals. Likewise, students who exhibit a lower level of productivity in their academic endeavors tend to experience challenges in achieving success in their personal and professional lives [52]. The productivity of students in their work is contingent upon their achievements, as these achievements serve as a tangible manifestation of their performance [53,54].…”

Vzgoja in izobraževanjemed preteklostjo in prihodnostjo / Upbringing and Education between the Past and the Future

“…2021;Doolan idr. 2021;Li 2022;Stevanović, Božić in Radović 2021;Zrim Martinjak 2022), kar je lahko glavni vir nezadovoljstva študenta (Mehall 2020;Vignery 2021). Za študenta, ki živi oddaljen od družine in najožjih prijateljev, so lahko povezanosti s študijskimi kolegi njegove najpomembnejše socialne povezave in pomemben vir socialne podpore (Mai, Wu in Huang 2021).…”

“…Glede na spoznanja o pomenu socialnega povezovanja za vzpostavitev učne skupnosti (Swan 2002), občutek pripadnosti (Picciano 2002), posameznikov študijski proces (Vignery in Laurier 2020), motivacijo za študij (Aguilera-Hermida 2020; Aristovnik idr. 2020; Pandit in Agrawal 2021; Smoyer, O'Brien in Rodriguez-Keyes 2020) in študijsko učinkovitost (Vignery 2021; Vignery in Laurier 2020) je študij v socialni izolaciji med pandemijo covida-19 študenta lahko soočil s številnimi izzivi. Omejitev socialnih interakcij lahko povzroči občutek nepovezanosti, kar lahko rezultira v nižji stopnji udeležbe v študijskem procesu, nižjih dosežkih in celo v opustitvi študija; sprememba študijskega konteksta lahko spremeni študentovo doživljanje interakcij in lastne socialne prisotnosti v razredni skupnosti (Li 2022).…”

“…Na pomen interakcij med udeleženimi v študijskem procesu je izkušnja pandemije covida-19 še posebej opozorila (Bork-Hüffer idr. 2021; Vignery 2021). Raziskovalci ugotavljajo povezanosti med socialno interakcijo (Mehall 2020), ki spodbuja zaupanje in povezanost, ter med akademskimi dosežki (Bork-Hüffer idr.…”

Let’s do this together: Do the quantity and the quality of collaborative learning predict achievement among college students?

“…SNA has been used to explore interactions within CL groups and their association with achievement, as well. In a recent literature review, Vignery (2021) concluded that the findings are inconsistent; some studies found that students who are more central in their course’s network (both within and across groups) have better performance in the course (e.g. Williams et al, 2019), whereas others found no such effects (e.g.…”