A literature search for the years 1985 to 2013 used proxy variables to mine specialty data from the National Practitioner Data Bank for 2004-2013. The proxy variables allowed examination of anesthesiologists, surgeons, pediatricians, and psychiatrists. The literature review revealed that both systemic and individual factors were involved in malpractice incidence and settlements. Systemic factors noted were the system of assessing blame or fault for medical errors (which is absent in some other countries), fi nancial pressures on physicians, malpractice insurance rates, and the fact that some medical specialties are at higher risk than others for personal injury lawsuits. The most prevalent individual factor was physician failure to make the correct diagnosis. The authors conclude that although individual factors may be amenable to improvements through risk reduction education, addressing systemic factors will require changes in health policy. They also note the modest decline in the rates of medical malpractice reports and payments for physicians between 2004 and 2011-rates that differ by specialty. 1 to include the methodology used. One indicated that specialties involving some aspect of surgery were at the highest end of liability, and psychiatry, pediatrics, and family medicine were at the lower end. The other study found emergency medicine, general surgery, obstetrics, and radiology at the high-risk end and general and family practice and pediatrics at the low end. Because the literature search revealed a paucity of studies that indicate differences in risk by specialty, dedicating just three paragraphs to the topic indicated by the article title, the authors instead focused on systemic versus individual factors that place all providers at risk, concluding that only changes in healthcare policy will make a signifi cant difference. The topic of risk stratifi cation by specialty needs further empirical research. A comprehensive review of the articles, their strengths and weaknesses, with conclusions and summary drawn from the compilation of those articles, remains a valuable instrument for the malpractice risk by specialty debate. That article should also discuss the proxies available through the National Practitioner Data Bank and what conclusions may safely be drawn. 2 Further research using regional or local sources of information such as state medical boards, professional societies, and liability carriers also is needed to clearly answer the specialty risk question. REFERENCES 1. Reich A, Schatzberg A. Empirical comparisons of malpractice claims of different medical specialties. J Public Health Aspects. 2015;2(2):1-7. 2. Hooker R, Nicholson J, et al. Does the employment of physician assistants and nurse practitioners increase liability? J Medical Licensure Discipline. 2009;95(2):6-16.