2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Findings From the INANE Survey on Student Papers Submitted to Nursing Journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the expectation is explicit and with senior faculty as co-authors, students may be more likely to submit their work because of that external motivation (Kennedy, Newland, & Owens, 2016). When the expectation is explicit and with senior faculty as co-authors, students may be more likely to submit their work because of that external motivation (Kennedy, Newland, & Owens, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the expectation is explicit and with senior faculty as co-authors, students may be more likely to submit their work because of that external motivation (Kennedy, Newland, & Owens, 2016). When the expectation is explicit and with senior faculty as co-authors, students may be more likely to submit their work because of that external motivation (Kennedy, Newland, & Owens, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennedy et al (2016) noted that the expectation to disseminate the final scholarly product, often in the form of a publishable manuscript, has taxed the limited resources of editors. Kennedy et al (2016) noted that the expectation to disseminate the final scholarly product, often in the form of a publishable manuscript, has taxed the limited resources of editors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having found that nursing students frequently fail to follow author guidelines, Kennedy et al. () suggest the need for closer oversight by supervisors or mentors. Most supervisors or mentors are more experienced than students, who are often neophyte researchers and should take ultimate responsibility for ensuring that authorship protocols are followed (Kennedy et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() suggest the need for closer oversight by supervisors or mentors. Most supervisors or mentors are more experienced than students, who are often neophyte researchers and should take ultimate responsibility for ensuring that authorship protocols are followed (Kennedy et al., ). Research students should be offered formalized mentoring programs that help them improve their knowledge and skills onwriting for publication and improve their understanding of author roles and responsibilities (Pierce, ; Price, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success in publishing is something to be celebrated and to be proud of, thereby worth the sacrifice in time and energy to see the process through to publication. It was precisely this lack of follow through that was the impetus for a group of nurse editors who organized a workgroup to study issues with student papers (Kennedy, Newland, & Owens, 2016) and provide guidance to faculty (Cowell & Pierson, 2016) on how to promote successful writing and publishing experiences in graduate nursing education. A key element in the findings from the nurse editors' project was that students did not understand the larger picture of scholarly publication and treated the assignment as akin to submitting a paper to faculty for a grade.…”
Section: How Does This Situation Reflect On Professionalism?mentioning
confidence: 99%