2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1805.10445
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-Grained Age Estimation in the wild with Attention LSTM Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, we employ only a single model and light data augmentation in testing. Moreover, our approach outperforms [17] by as much as 0.045 in terms of -error while using same backbone model, i.e., ResNet-34. In addition, the proposed approach still yields a clear performance advantage even when [17] adopts a more powerful backbone architecture, i.e., RoR-34.…”
Section: E Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison, we employ only a single model and light data augmentation in testing. Moreover, our approach outperforms [17] by as much as 0.045 in terms of -error while using same backbone model, i.e., ResNet-34. In addition, the proposed approach still yields a clear performance advantage even when [17] adopts a more powerful backbone architecture, i.e., RoR-34.…”
Section: E Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, our approach outperforms [17] by as much as 0.045 in terms of -error while using same backbone model, i.e., ResNet-34. In addition, the proposed approach still yields a clear performance advantage even when [17] adopts a more powerful backbone architecture, i.e., RoR-34. In summary, the above comparisons demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.…”
Section: E Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, deep convolutional neural network (CNN) based approaches [17,22,30] have been commonly used for automatic age and gender classification. Generally, frontal or close to frontal face images have been used in these studies [17,18,10,34,22]. There have also been studies about gender classification from ear images [7,14,16,30,11,1,19,24,21,5] and profile face im-* The authors have equally contributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%