2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine motor skill proficiency in typically developing children: On or off the maturation track?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
63
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in performance could arise because children are spending less time practicing writing skills, and more time using electronic devices. Our results are consistent with a recent study which showed that typically developing children score lower than expected norms on several standardized tests of fine motor skills (Gaul & Issartel, 2016).…”
Section: Profile Of Visuomotor Skill Developmentsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The reduction in performance could arise because children are spending less time practicing writing skills, and more time using electronic devices. Our results are consistent with a recent study which showed that typically developing children score lower than expected norms on several standardized tests of fine motor skills (Gaul & Issartel, 2016).…”
Section: Profile Of Visuomotor Skill Developmentsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While there seems to be an agreement regarding girls outperforming boys in fine motor activities, results concerning a sex gap in other areas or in general coordination are often inconclusive. Previous research has already argued that girls get fewer opportunities to practice gross motor activities, encouragement and reinforcement, while simultaneously participating more in drawing and cutting activities, resulting in different motor competence patterns [35]. Consequently, it is to be expected to find that, in general, children show more proficiency in those activities which they engage in and practice more frequently (i.e., fine motor and self-care activities for girls, and gross motor and dynamic activities for boys).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2 (MC-HOME) × 3 (SES) general linear model was conducted to explore differences in MD. An analysis of covariance was used to test whether main and interaction effects changed with the presence of Age (covariate), because previous studies report that MD changes with age (Gaul & Issartel, 2016;Spessato, Gabbard, Valentini, & Rudisill, 2012). Gender did not show significant differences in the preliminary analyses; therefore, it was not included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%