1985
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(85)90619-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-Needle Aspirates of Uveal Melanomas and Prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several groups have reported the cytopathological classification of the tumor cells they obtained during FNAB (13,15,16,18) , and occasional groups have also reported cytopathological versus histopathological classification of tumors evaluated by FNAB and managed by enucleation and transcleral resection (10,15,17,22,35) . Although reported studies of cytopathological classification of tumor cells obtained by FNAB and histopathological classification of the entire tumor evaluated following enucleation show reasonably good agreement between these assignments (10,17,19,22,35) , many clinicians and ophthalmic pathologists remain skeptical about the reliability and prognostic value of melanoma pathological classification based on FNAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several groups have reported the cytopathological classification of the tumor cells they obtained during FNAB (13,15,16,18) , and occasional groups have also reported cytopathological versus histopathological classification of tumors evaluated by FNAB and managed by enucleation and transcleral resection (10,15,17,22,35) . Although reported studies of cytopathological classification of tumor cells obtained by FNAB and histopathological classification of the entire tumor evaluated following enucleation show reasonably good agreement between these assignments (10,17,19,22,35) , many clinicians and ophthalmic pathologists remain skeptical about the reliability and prognostic value of melanoma pathological classification based on FNAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reported studies of cytopathological classification of tumor cells obtained by FNAB and histopathological classification of the entire tumor evaluated following enucleation show reasonably good agreement between these assignments (10,17,19,22,35) , many clinicians and ophthalmic pathologists remain skeptical about the reliability and prognostic value of melanoma pathological classification based on FNAB. This skepticism seems to stem from concern about the potential for FNAB to yield non-representative tumor specimens, recognition that cytology provides only cellular features and not tissue features of the tumors (which are important for histopathological classification), and realization that there is considerable variability in histopathological classification of uveal melanomas by ophthalmic pathologists who analyze the same microslides of selected tumors (43,44) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ophthalmic one-pass FNAB sampling of intraocular tumors does not yield material that is satisfactory for prognostication in cytologically heterogeneous neoplasms. [17][18][19] It is possible for a patient to harbor a significant quantity of metastatic disease to the liver and maintain normal hepatic enzymes. 20 Therefore, the application of any new therapy likely to be effective in treating metastatic melanoma would be most efficacious if applied before the metastatic tumor burden is great.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of sampling error and misclassification is thought to be less important if larger enucleation specimens are used, as these are more representative of the tumor than biopsies. 21,23 In this study, larger enucleation specimens were used from the patient tumors, minimizing the risk of misclassification.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%