“…In most of these early cases, the objective of the FNAB was to establish, confirm, or refute the clinical diagnosis of the evaluated intraocular tumor and direct baseline systemic evaluation of the patient, treatment of the primary intraocular tumor, and post-treatment follow-up (1,4,5,9,(13)(14)(15) . Over the years, various authors have described and illustrated the cytomorphological and immunocytochemical features of melanocytic uveal tumor cells obtained by FNAB (1,13,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) and the relative frequencies of spindle, epithelioid, mixed and necrotic tumor cells in the obtained specimens (13,15,17) . A few groups of investigators have described the correlation between cytopathological and histopathological classification of the uveal me lanoma cells in cases treated by enucleation or transcleral tumor resection, (4,10,15,17,22) and some investigators have also reported the frequency of insufficient aspirates for cytopathological diagnosis in their series and factors associated with this result (3,8,10,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) .…”