2019
DOI: 10.26611/1051031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine needle aspiration cytology as a diagnostic tool for assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy in a hospital-based study in garhwal region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] A study conducted by Wani et al study revealed that OSPE can be executed for the entire haematology practical session so as to make sure that all the students get identical questions with comparable difficulty levels. [14] In the present study, 53 % of the students stated that the level of stress in OSPE was less as compared with the traditional practical examination, which is similar to a study conducted by Wadde et al [15] According to the students, the structured checklist pattern in OSPE helped them through the different steps and also enabled identification of their weaknesses thereby creating a learning stimulus [16,17] . On scrutinising the answers given by the students in the OSPE session, the most common mistakes were identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[13] A study conducted by Wani et al study revealed that OSPE can be executed for the entire haematology practical session so as to make sure that all the students get identical questions with comparable difficulty levels. [14] In the present study, 53 % of the students stated that the level of stress in OSPE was less as compared with the traditional practical examination, which is similar to a study conducted by Wadde et al [15] According to the students, the structured checklist pattern in OSPE helped them through the different steps and also enabled identification of their weaknesses thereby creating a learning stimulus [16,17] . On scrutinising the answers given by the students in the OSPE session, the most common mistakes were identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%