1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1987.tb01347.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Breast Disease Management—a 4 Year Experience

Abstract: At the queen victoria medical centre between 1981 and 1984. 2920 fine needle aspirates of the breast were examined with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 97% and a sensitivity of 80%. This high diagnostic accuracy combined with the ease and complication‐fm nature of the procedure has meant that fine needle aspiration (fna) has become an important p˜tl of the investigation and management of breast disease within the breast service of the queen victoria medical centre.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques assess therapeutic effects by either over-or underestimating the extent of residual disease due to fibrosis or sampling error (2,6,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Although histology is the gold standard, the histological correlation of response with all of the above-mentioned modalities is not satisfactory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques assess therapeutic effects by either over-or underestimating the extent of residual disease due to fibrosis or sampling error (2,6,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Although histology is the gold standard, the histological correlation of response with all of the above-mentioned modalities is not satisfactory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this lower unsatisfactory rate was the result of the skill (better at performing FNA) or of the technique (repeating unsatisfactory FNAs to obtain sufficient material prior to issuing a report) of the cytopathologist performing NPFD could not be determined from our data. Breast FNA unsatisfactory rates are influenced by patient factors-age, 18 lesion size, 2,18,21 lesion palpability (discrete lump or thickening), 6,7,10,15,20,23 benign or malignant histology, 6,18,20 and histologic type 2,21,24 -and operator factors. 3,4,16,18,25,26 Palombini et al noted better results from series in which the cytopathologist who interpreted the smears also performed the FNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%