1997
DOI: 10.1159/000332800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis of tubular carcinoma by FNA cytology is generally difficult (Fig. ) . The identification of rigid tubular structures should raise the diagnostic possibility of tubular carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of tubular carcinoma by FNA cytology is generally difficult (Fig. ) . The identification of rigid tubular structures should raise the diagnostic possibility of tubular carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tubular carcinoma can be misinterpreted as benign because of the lack of cellular atypia and epithelial dissociation and presence of myoepithelial cells on the cytologic specimen. 6,7 Although these overlapping features of sclerosing adenosis with this tumor can create diagnostic confusion, the epithelial sheets with variable appearance, especially acinar sheets; frequent hyalinized stroma; and absence of angular sheets enabled a differentiation from tubular carcinoma. Frequent acinar sheets and scattered, discohesive epithelial cells observed in cytologic smears of sclerosing adenosis may cause diagnostic confusion with lobular carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCs are more frequently hypercellular and the abnormal tubules are more abundant and diffuse and have a more rigid outline or acutely angled configuration. Discohesive cells are also more abundant [82,83,84,85,86]. Single cells with intact cytoplasm could mimic lobular carcinoma.…”
Section: Proliferative Breast Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of TC by FNAC is difficult with less than 50% of cases classified as C5 [82,83,84,85,86]. The characteristic findings include tubular structures, noteworthy dissociation, paucity of myoepithelium and cellular atypia [86].…”
Section: Mammary Carcinoma and Its Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%