Fine-needle aspiration biopsy may provide miniscule material for diagnosis. A method was devised to ensure optimal retrieval of the specimen. If performed in the manner described, at least four to five different samples from each case may be obtained. This includes a smear stained with the Papanicolaou and hematoxylin and eosin methods, a cell block preparation, and at least two cytocentrifuge specimens. In 85 cases in which the method was applied and subsequently analyzed, we found the cell block and Papanicolaou-stained smears to be most eflective for diagnosis, whereas the cytocentrifuge method was much less effective. The sensitivity and specijicity were 93 % and loo%, respectively.Diagn Cytopathol 1991;7:308-316.Key Words: Cytology; Cytopathology; Retrieval of FNAB materialThe clinician has three unspoken expectations when ordering any biopsy. First, the accuracy of the diagnosis, particularly concerning the malignant potential of the lesion sampled, must be beyond question. Second, in case of malignancy, the tumor type and its degree of differentiation must be accurately given. Finally, when possible, the origin of the neoplasm (whether it is primary or secondary to the organ being biopsied) must be identified. In general, these expectations are met by standard histological techniques. Recently, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has proved to be equally effective in this regard, particularly with lesions that can be approached only with difficulty using the standard biopsy techniques. l4 Because it is a cytological method, FNAB has certain handicaps in meeting all the goals cited above, the greatest being that the sample may be small and may not provide details on tissue architecture that may be vital for tumor classification.To overcome these hurdles in performing FNAB, we have devised a method that maximizes specimen retrieval and provides, in most cases, four to five different cytological and/or histological preparations from one or more aspirates obtained during a single sitting. These multiple specimens not only provide ample specimens for adequate evaluation of the cytological criteria of malignancy but also a direct method for judging histological details. This allows for better classification of neoplasms, which is based, after all, on histology. The use of these techniques is not new. However, the emphasis on the proper sequence of their application to provide maximum sample, to our knowledge, has not been reported.Our report deals with a group of 85 patients in whom 94 separate aspirates were performed. The smears stained with the Papanicolaou method and cell block preparations were most useful; the cytocentrifugation slide technique was less helpful in meeting our objectives.