2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-root distribution and morphology in an acidic Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand in SW Sweden in relation to granulated wood ash application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, our specific root length are in agreement with other studies in Norway spruce stands (e.g. Pü ttsepp et al 2006), but are much lower as compared to the study by Ostonen et al (1999) who reported 31-47 m g -1 for mycorrhizal short roots. Another morphological parameter that is associated with soil chemical conditions is the diameter of fine roots which varied between 0.44 and 0.54 mm in the humus layer and generally increased in the mineral soil at our sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, our specific root length are in agreement with other studies in Norway spruce stands (e.g. Pü ttsepp et al 2006), but are much lower as compared to the study by Ostonen et al (1999) who reported 31-47 m g -1 for mycorrhizal short roots. Another morphological parameter that is associated with soil chemical conditions is the diameter of fine roots which varied between 0.44 and 0.54 mm in the humus layer and generally increased in the mineral soil at our sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, our specific root length values for the upper layers in the MF and BF are consistent with studies in Norway spruce stands (Borken et al 2007;Püttsepp et al 2006), but they are much lower than those of Ostonen et al (1999), who reported 31-47 m g −1 for mycorrhizal short roots. Furthermore, to better understand the relationship between fine root form and function in forest ecosystem, it is essential to explore variations in root morphology and the branching systems of trees and understorey plants (Guo et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3). This trend is similar to that seen in many forest types (e.g., Makkonen and Helmisaari 2001;Claus and George 2005;Püttsepp et al 2006;Yanai et al 2006;Borken et al 2007;Sakai et al 2007;Børja et al 2008). Therefore, fine root biomass decreases with soil depth even within shallow soils of 15 cm depth in this subalpine Abies forest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Fine root biomass decreases with soil depth in many forest types (e.g., Makkonen and Helmisaari 2001;Claus and George 2005;Püttsepp et al 2006;Yanai et al 2006;Borken et al 2007;Sakai et al 2007;Børja et al 2008). For SRL, two vertical patterns have been reported: no change with soil depth (Borken et al 2007;Zhou and Shangguan 2007) and decreasing with soil depth (Bakker et al 2006;Püttsepp et al 2006;Fujimaki et al 2007). Moreover, the nitrogen Sequential change of stand age Wind Tree mortality and Sequential change of stand age Wind Tree mortality and regeneration Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%