2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3361-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine root dynamics after soil disturbance evaluated with a root scanner method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1; Appendix S1: Fig. Recently, a similar scanner method had been successfully used to explore fine root production in a forest setting (Van Do et al 2016, Nakahata andOsawa 2017). Recently, a similar scanner method had been successfully used to explore fine root production in a forest setting (Van Do et al 2016, Nakahata andOsawa 2017).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Rhizotron Methods For Assessing Root Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1; Appendix S1: Fig. Recently, a similar scanner method had been successfully used to explore fine root production in a forest setting (Van Do et al 2016, Nakahata andOsawa 2017). Recently, a similar scanner method had been successfully used to explore fine root production in a forest setting (Van Do et al 2016, Nakahata andOsawa 2017).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Rhizotron Methods For Assessing Root Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a similar scanner method had been successfully used to explore fine root production in a forest setting (Van Do et al 2016, Nakahata andOsawa 2017). For instance, soil disturbance associated with installation may artificially affect root longevity and production (Strand et al 2008, Nakahata andOsawa 2017). To date, very few studies traced roots by branch order in situ (Espeleta et al 2009, Xia et al 2010.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Rhizotron Methods For Assessing Root Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations