2020
DOI: 10.3390/f11101078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-Scale Microclimate Pattern in Forest-Steppe Habitat

Abstract: Microclimate and vegetation architecture are interdependent. Little information is available, however, about the fine-scale spatio-temporal relationship between the microclimate and herb layer of forest-steppe mosaics. In 2018 a three-season-long vegetation sampling and measurements of air temperature and air humidity were performed along 4 transects (44 m long each) in the herb layer with 89 dataloggers in the sandy region of Central Hungary, in a poplar grove and the surrounding open grassland. In order to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trees of the forest‐steppe have strong feedbacks on local conditions beneath their canopy. Tree canopies intercept solar radiation, leading to low light availability, cooler diurnal temperature and higher relative air humidity at the forest floor, and the canopy reduces heat loss at night compared to the steppes (Breshears et al ., 1997 ; D'Odorico et al ., 2013 ; Tölgyesi et al ., 2018 , 2020 ; Süle et al ., 2020 ). Microclimatic extremes are also tempered within forest patches by the edges acting as wind breaks and thus attenuating evaporation compared to adjacent grasslands (Davies‐Colley, Payne & van Elswijk, 2000 ).…”
Section: Models Of Forest–grassland Coexistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees of the forest‐steppe have strong feedbacks on local conditions beneath their canopy. Tree canopies intercept solar radiation, leading to low light availability, cooler diurnal temperature and higher relative air humidity at the forest floor, and the canopy reduces heat loss at night compared to the steppes (Breshears et al ., 1997 ; D'Odorico et al ., 2013 ; Tölgyesi et al ., 2018 , 2020 ; Süle et al ., 2020 ). Microclimatic extremes are also tempered within forest patches by the edges acting as wind breaks and thus attenuating evaporation compared to adjacent grasslands (Davies‐Colley, Payne & van Elswijk, 2000 ).…”
Section: Models Of Forest–grassland Coexistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, nearby woodlots may provide microclimatic conditions that protect larval stages and grass blades from heat stress, regardless of the nature of the wider landscape. At the level of the host plant, even small nearby woodlots could provide shade, block wind, and retain outgoing radiation (Geiger et al, 2003; Süle et al, 2020). However, on a landscape scale, forest, agricultural, and urban climatic conditions differ significantly: forests typically buffer fluctuations in temperature and humidity with effects gradually diminishing toward the forest edges (Lin et al, 2020) and cause sub‐canopy cooling during summer (Haesen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the measurement of VPD has gained much more attention in studies on plant microhabitats (Aguirre et al, 2021; Davies‐Colley et al, 2000; Süle et al, 2020; von Arx et al, 2013), it may also matter for microclimates that affect small organisms like insects. VPD is exponentially related to changes in temperature under constant humidity and is regarded as the “drying power” of the air on wet surfaces (Monteith & Unsworth, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest–steppe ecotone is partially shaded, which limits the adverse effects of direct sunlight, but still ensures sufficient light for species that are generally considered light‐demanding to thrive (see Roleček et al, 2017). Partial shading and lower wind speeds also buffer climatic extremes and reduce evaporation and transpiration, which promote water retention (De Frenne et al, 2019; Süle et al, 2020). Leaf litter is partially blown away from ecotones, resulting in less nutrient enrichment than in the forest interior (Gonschorrek, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%