2022
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine‐scale movement and habitat use of juvenile, subadult, and adult green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in a foraging ground at Ningaloo Reef, Australia

Abstract: 1. The residence, home range, and habitat use of juvenile (42.0-63.5 cm midline curved carapace length, CCL), subadult (68.6-84.6 cm CCL), and adult (81.9-104.2 cm CCL) green turtles (Chelonia mydas) was investigated using passive acoustic telemetry in Ningaloo Marine Park, north-western Australia.Eighty-one turtles ranging in size from 42 to 104 cm CCL were captured on their foraging grounds and tagged with acoustic tags.2. Individuals were monitored for up to 913 days (range 48-913 days, median 367 days). Tu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the findings of Babcock et al [45], both telemetry approaches provided comparable overall tracking durations in this study [45]. Our satellite tracking durations (20 to 234 d) were equivalent to those reported in recent studies tracking juvenile green turtles [92,93]; however, the acoustic tracking durations (8 to 237 d) were considerably shorter than those in the current literature, which have tracked individuals for over a year and even up to 2.5 years [94,95]. Range distributions in particular are heavily influenced by the number of times an individual crosses its range (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similar to the findings of Babcock et al [45], both telemetry approaches provided comparable overall tracking durations in this study [45]. Our satellite tracking durations (20 to 234 d) were equivalent to those reported in recent studies tracking juvenile green turtles [92,93]; however, the acoustic tracking durations (8 to 237 d) were considerably shorter than those in the current literature, which have tracked individuals for over a year and even up to 2.5 years [94,95]. Range distributions in particular are heavily influenced by the number of times an individual crosses its range (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We observed no correlation between 90% UD (home range) and turtle size. Other studies have reported a positive relationship between turtle size and home range size [43,53]. The absence of correlation in our study may be due to the narrow range of sizes of tracked turtles (48.4-69.4 cm SCL), rather than a sampling of the full range of neritic juveniles (25-80 cm) that occur in Bermuda.…”
Section: Home Rangecontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…In a comparison of telemetry methods used with marine turtles, Thomson et al [41] (Table 1) showed that both passive and active acoustic tracking have similar location accuracy to data from Fastloc-GPS, i.e., tens to hundreds of meters. Thus, along with Fastloc-GPS studies, results from acoustic tracking of juvenile green turtles in benthic developmental habitats in which locations were taken either by mobile observers [50,51] or fixed arrays [52,53] appear to provide more useful comparisons to our study than results based on Argos or combined Argos and GPS location data.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 84%
“…We investigated ontogenetic changes in the diet of C. mydas in a tropical coastal lagoon in north-western Australia. C. mydas at this location are long-term residents that show size-related changes in home range size, home range location, and diet (Pillans et al, 2022;Stubbs et al, 2022). Size is a good predictor of age (Mayne et al, 2022), and here we use size as a proxy for age to further explore ontogenetic patterns in the home range location and diet of C. mydas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%