“…The authors tested if distinct levels of DNA methylation variation could explain differential survival rates between fish in two different habitats, but found no significant differences, possibly due to small sample size (six fish in total) and low-resolution methods (MS-AFLP). However, recent studies in clonal fish (Chrosomus eos-neogaeus) (Massicotte et al, 2011;Massicotte & Angers, 2012), round-leaf bats (Hipposideros armiger) (Liu et al, 2012), house sparrows (Passer domesticus) Liebl et al, 2013), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) (Mor an & P erez-Figueroa, 2011), Darwin's finches (Skinner et al, 2014), red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica) (Wenzel & Piertney, 2014), Daphnia (Schield et al, 2015), yellow baboon (Papio cynocephalus) (Lea et al, 2016), Tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi) (Smith et al, 2016) and threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) (Smith et al, 2015;Trucchi et al, 2016) all showed population, habitat or species-specific DNA methylation patterns. These patterns may indicate that epigenetic variation is both environmentally sensitive and common among wild animal populations, and could play an important role in regulating phenotypic traits during local adaptation.…”