2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.76.235409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine structure of the local pseudogap and Fano effect for superconducting electrons near a zigzag graphene edge

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7, where the LDOS profile at ω = 2∆ is plotted on a larger scale. A similar effect has been shown to occur in the case of nanoribbons with zigzag edges [19].…”
Section: Proximity Effect On a Semi-infinite Graphene Layersupporting
confidence: 63%
“…7, where the LDOS profile at ω = 2∆ is plotted on a larger scale. A similar effect has been shown to occur in the case of nanoribbons with zigzag edges [19].…”
Section: Proximity Effect On a Semi-infinite Graphene Layersupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The effect on the local density of states (LDOS) has been studied in Refs. [6,7]. The properties of bound states arising from multiple Andreev reflections in S-graphene-S junctions have been analyzed in Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although graphene is not intrinsically superconducting, the superconducting electrode can induce a pairing amplitude by proximity effect. [28][29][30] We choose the width of the central region to be comparable to the superconducting coherence length W S = ξ =hv F / . For a typical superconductor like Pb or Al, ∼ 1 meV and thus ξ ∼ 0.5 − 1 μm.…”
Section: Independent Focusing Of Electrons and Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of these peaks decays exponentially with the distance to the superconductor, consistent with the behavior of the proximity effect in a graphene-superconductor interface. [28][29][30] While the previous analysis explains the separate focusing of electrons and holes, it would be desirable that the background EC conductance at the CAR peak could be further reduced. This can be achieved by increasing the injection distance d. Indeed, the injection point (−d,0) determines the origin of the sequence of focusing points in which the separation between maxima of T ee and that of T eh is W S .…”
Section: Independent Focusing Of Electrons and Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%