1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02816853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine tuning in one-higgs and two-higgs standard models

Abstract: The fine-tuning principles are examined to predict the top-quark and Higgs-boson masses. The modification of the Veltman condition based on the compensation of vacuum energies is developed. It is implemented in the Standard Model and in its minimal extension with two Higgs doublets. The top-quark and Higgs-boson couplings are fitted in the SM for the lowest ultraviolet scale where the fine-tuning can be stable under rescaling. It yields the low-energy values m t ≃ 175GeV ; m H ≃ 210GeV .

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For renormalization group studies, especially the role of Higgs self-couplings is crucial and has been studied in the literature, in the SM (see for instance [7,40]) as well as in the 2HDM [5,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47], because these quartic couplings tend to destabilize the Higgs potential at some µ high . Since a break-down of stability would mean that our theory would lose validity beyond a certain scale, we want to impose a stable Higgs potential beyond µ ew as a constraint on all couplings.…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)052mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For renormalization group studies, especially the role of Higgs self-couplings is crucial and has been studied in the literature, in the SM (see for instance [7,40]) as well as in the 2HDM [5,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47], because these quartic couplings tend to destabilize the Higgs potential at some µ high . Since a break-down of stability would mean that our theory would lose validity beyond a certain scale, we want to impose a stable Higgs potential beyond µ ew as a constraint on all couplings.…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)052mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If µ nat is large enough, the logarithmic factor might compensate for the loop suppression, and the power series of the higher order corrections no longer converges. So requiring the cancellation of the first order Higgs mass correction -like often applied in the literature [42,52,53,57] -is not sufficient if we do not know about the higher order terms. Only if we assume perturbativity of the power series, we can make a valid statement about whether the Higgs mass at the electroweak scale can be natural in the 2HDM or at least whether the hierarchy problem can be mitigated.…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)052mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requirement involves a severe fine-tuning (as with a scalar field [31][32][33][34], Stueckelberg vector [35] and spacetime curvature [36,37]) and cannot form a viable stabilization mechanism.…”
Section: Spin-3/2 Field In Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dimensão extra desse modelo é compactificada num círculo S 1 (figura 3.1a) e tem tamanho R, onde R −1 deve ser da ordem de TeV para evitar o fine-tuning [49] dos parâmetros do setor de Higgs sendo, portanto, experimentalmente acessível aos aceleradores atuais. O Modelo de MUED possui então três parâmetros livres: R, Λ e a massa do bóson de Higgs, m h .…”
Section: Decomposição Dos Modos De Kaluza-kleinunclassified