1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92343-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finger Clubbing: A Quantitative Survey by Analysis of the Shadowgraph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of tested objective measurement criteria (1,16) certainly is an advantage over the subjective clinical impression, with its inherent difficulties for comparisons of the late postoperative appearance of the fingers with their preoperative aspect. The method employed for the production and registration of images of the fingers, (21) exploring the shadow projection, similar to others previously reported, (18) is also very simple and easy to perform. The reversal changes in the fingers of the patients in the DC group were not observed in the immediate (by day 7) or recent (by day 18) postoperative periods, but only later, after day 90.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The use of tested objective measurement criteria (1,16) certainly is an advantage over the subjective clinical impression, with its inherent difficulties for comparisons of the late postoperative appearance of the fingers with their preoperative aspect. The method employed for the production and registration of images of the fingers, (21) exploring the shadow projection, similar to others previously reported, (18) is also very simple and easy to perform. The reversal changes in the fingers of the patients in the DC group were not observed in the immediate (by day 7) or recent (by day 18) postoperative periods, but only later, after day 90.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…and 172.8 ± 5.3° ( 21) • for HA: 180.1 ± 4.2°, (18) 178.9 ± 4.7°, (19) 177.9 ± 4.6°, (5) 181.5 ± 4.8°, (21) and 186.0 ± 2.0° ( 16) • for the DPD/IPD ratio: 0.904 ± 0.029 mm (21) and 0.903 ± 0.043 mm (22) In normal children, such values are not significantly different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations