Finger millet (Eleucine corocana L. Gaertn.) as a cover crop on weed control, growth and yield of soybean under different tillage systems

Samarajeewa, Kbdp; Horiuchi, Takatsugu; Oba, Shinya

doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.08.018

Cited by 38 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There is a wide agreement in the researches conclusion that living cover crops will suppress weeds successfully. Barnes and Putnam (1983) Samarajeewa et al (2006). The suppressive effect of cover crop could be due to inhibition of weed seed germination through effect on the radiation and chemicals environment of seeds.…”

Section: Weed Biomass and Corn Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response of leaf area and dry matter of crop, weeds and cover crops to competition and fertilizer resources

Dadashi

Zaefarian

Abbasi

et al. 2015

AAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plasticity of plants to allocate leaf area and dry matter to upper layer of canopy play important role in canopy architecture and competition. In order to study the vertical distribution of leaf area and dry matter of corn (Zea mays L.), cover crops and weeds canopy in different fertilizer condition and competition, a randomized complete block design experiment with 8 treatments and 3 replicates was conducted at Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University in 2012. Treatments were included corn with soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) as cover crop without fertilizer application, corn with soybean as cover crop with chemical fertilizer application, corn with soybean as cover crop with compost fertilizer application, corn with wheat (Triticum aesitivum L.) as cover crop without fertilizer application, corn with wheat as cover crop with chemical fertilizer application, corn with wheat as cover crop with compost fertilizer application and corn monoculture both in weedy and weed free conditions. The results showed that weed infestation reduced total leaf area and dry matter of corn. Corn distributed more leaf area and dry mater of canopy to the upper layer in weedy conditions. Between cover crops, soybeans allocated corn leaf area and dry mater to the higher layers of canopy than wheat. Also, soybean reduced leaf area and dry mater production of weeds more than wheat. Soybean as cover crop with the use of compost treatment was more efficient in reducing of weed biomass and corn yield production.

show abstract

Section: Weed Biomass and Corn Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response of leaf area and dry matter of crop, weeds and cover crops to competition and fertilizer resources

Dadashi

Zaefarian

Abbasi

et al. 2015

AAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CA benefits include less fuel consumption (Baker et al, 2007;Tahir et al, 2008;Lithourgidis et al, 2009;Akbarnia and Farhani, 2014), reduced soil loss due to enhanced aggregate stability and the protective effect of crop residues left over the soil (Friedrich et al, 2011;Sanderson et al, 2013;Vanlauwe et al, 2014). It is more productive as compared to conventional tillage because it improves soil quality and water use efficiency of plants (Samarajeewa et al, 2006;Brunel et al, 2013;Muchabi et al, 2014). Conservation tillage creates more continuous pore systems and reduces the soil porosity for aeration but increase the capillary porosity, helps improving soil water holding capacity (Bhattachariya et al, 2008;Kishor et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Various Tillage Practices on Soil Physical Properties and Wheat Performance in Different Wheat-based Cropping Systems

Shahzad¹,

Farooq²,

Jabran³

et al. 2016

IJAB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Excessive tillage in conventional agriculture systems may cause plough pan, which alters soil physical properties, and thus adversely affects the crop growth and productivity. This study was conducted to monitor the effect of different tillage practices in wheat-based cropping systems on soil physical properties, allometry and grain yield of wheat. Wheat was planted in different cropping systems (viz. fallow-wheat, rice-wheat, cotton-wheat, mungbean-wheat and sorghum-wheat with zero tillage, conventional tillage, deep tillage and on two types of beds (60/30 cm with four rows) and (90/45 cm with six rows). Interaction between different tillage practices and cropping systems had significant effect on soil bulk density and total porosity, wheat allometry and grain yield. Minimum bulk density tied with higher total porosity was recorded in both types of bed sowing followed by deep tillage. This improvement in soil physical properties caused improvement in leaf area index and duration, specific leaf area, crop growth, and net assimilation rates. As a result, the productivity of bed sown wheat was better; however, grain yield of zero tilled wheat was low due to poor crop growth and net assimilation rate. Wheat productivity was substantially low when planted after sorghum; nonetheless, and was quite high when sown after mungbean. In crux, wheat planting on beds after mungbean is the best option considering the long-term environmental sustainability of wheat-based cropping systems.

show abstract

“…In general, small-seeded weeds that require light to break dormancy will likely become the dominant weed species in minimum and no-tillage systems, including in the first years of adoption of CA. Thus, effective weed management is considered a critical issue and determines success in minimum and no-tillage based systems and CA [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Weed Management for Conservation Agriculture: Options for Smallholder Farmers

Sims¹,

Corsi²,

Gbèhounou³

et al. 2018

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Land degradation and soil fertility deterioration are two of the main causes of agricultural production stagnation and decline in many parts of the world. The model of crop production based on mechanical soil tillage and exposed soils is typically accompanied by negative effects on the natural resource base of the farming environment, which can be so serious that they jeopardize agricultural productive potential in the future. This form of agriculture is destructive to soil health and accelerates the loss of soil by increasing its mineralization and erosion rates. Conservation agriculture, a system avoiding or minimizing soil mechanical disturbance (no-tillage) combined with soil cover and crop diversification, is considered a sustainable agro-ecological approach to resource-conserving agricultural production. A major objective of tillage is supposed to be weed control, and it does not require very specific knowledge because soil inversion controls (at least temporarily) most weeds mechanically (i.e., by way of burying them). However, repeated ploughing only changes the weed population, but does not control weeds in the long term. The same applies to the mechanical uprooting of weeds. While in the short term some tillage operations can control weeds on farms, tillage systems can increase and propagate weeds off-farm. The absence of tillage, under conservation agriculture, requires other measures of weed control. One of the ways in which this is realized is through herbicide application. However, environmental concerns, herbicide resistance and access to appropriate agro-chemicals on the part of resource-poor farmers, highlight the need for alternative weed control strategies that are effective and accessible for smallholders adopting conservation agriculture. Farmers in semi-arid regions contend with the additional challenge of low biomass production and, often, competition with livestock enterprises, which limit the potential weed-suppressing benefits of mulch and living cover crops. This paper reviews the applicability and efficacy of various mechanical, biological and integrated weed management strategies for the effective and sustainable management of weeds in smallholder conservation agriculture systems, including the role of appropriate equipment and prerequisites for smallholders within a sustainable intensification scenario.Keywords: smallholder farming; conservation agriculture; sustainable and ecological weed management; preventive; cultural and direct control methods of weed management

show abstract

Finger millet (Eleucine corocana L. Gaertn.) as a cover crop on weed control, growth and yield of soybean under different tillage systems

Cited by 38 publications

References 25 publications

Response of leaf area and dry matter of crop, weeds and cover crops to competition and fertilizer resources

Response of leaf area and dry matter of crop, weeds and cover crops to competition and fertilizer resources

Influence of Various Tillage Practices on Soil Physical Properties and Wheat Performance in Different Wheat-based Cropping Systems

Sustainable Weed Management for Conservation Agriculture: Options for Smallholder Farmers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About