2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingermark detection using upconverting nanoparticles and comparison with cyanoacrylate fuming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kanodarwala et al compared the efficiency of tailor-made UCNPs with the benchmark method of cyanoacrylate fuming (CAF). Their studies concluded that, while CAF performed better across the substrates tested (aluminum foil, polyethylene, polypropylene, and glass slides), the UCNPs offered advantages for fingermark detection on multicolored, patterned, or luminous substrates owing to their unique optical properties . In another article by the same group, they used silica coated UCNPs to identify the potential pitfalls of UC fingerprinting detection techniques …”
Section: Emerging Applications Of Ucnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kanodarwala et al compared the efficiency of tailor-made UCNPs with the benchmark method of cyanoacrylate fuming (CAF). Their studies concluded that, while CAF performed better across the substrates tested (aluminum foil, polyethylene, polypropylene, and glass slides), the UCNPs offered advantages for fingermark detection on multicolored, patterned, or luminous substrates owing to their unique optical properties . In another article by the same group, they used silica coated UCNPs to identify the potential pitfalls of UC fingerprinting detection techniques …”
Section: Emerging Applications Of Ucnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silica NPs – The following papers aimed at optimizing the application of functionalized silica NPs to detect fingermarks: RuBpy-doped carboxyl-functionalized silica NPs [ 367 , 368 ] and upconverter-doped functionalized silica NPs [ 369 , 370 ]. These studies are briefly described here-below, and the most relevant observations/conclusions cited: in their first paper, Lee et al optimized the application protocol of their fluorescent silica NPs and compared their performance to [CA ➭ R6G] [ 367 ].…”
Section: Fingermark Visualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering depletion series of natural fingermarks left on three non-porous substrates (i.e., aluminium, PE and PP films) and aged up to 13 months, the authors made the following observations: (1) multiple immersions in silica NPs working solutions could improve the quality of fingermarks without presenting any background staining issue, (2) the possibility to successfully apply silica NPs by spraying has been demonstrated, (3) silica NPs and CA are both detrimental to each other, preventing hence their application in sequence. Kanodarwala et al described the synthesis of carboxyl-capped [ 370 ] and phenyl-capped [ 369 ] upconverter-doped silica NPs. The first ones led to poor performances when applied on natural fingermarks left on aluminium.…”
Section: Fingermark Visualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kanodarwala, Le sniewski, et al (2021) used a cyanoacrylate-rhodamine 6G (CAF-R6G) as a gold standard to compare the effectiveness of the core-shell UCNPs capped with phenyl groups (UCNP@SiO 2 -Ph) as developer across the various substrate types tested in their study. The authors could not observe the fingerprint development on glass and transparent polypropylene surfaces using UCNP@SiO 2 -Ph due to the background fluorescence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%