Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98EX170)
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.1998.712087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingerprint card classification with statistical feature integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a fingerprint image, for each ridge ending, there is generally a corresponding valley bifurcation and vice versa [2], with the only exception at the singularity points (cores and deltas) [14]. This is called the termination/bifurcation duality, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Postprocessing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a fingerprint image, for each ridge ending, there is generally a corresponding valley bifurcation and vice versa [2], with the only exception at the singularity points (cores and deltas) [14]. This is called the termination/bifurcation duality, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Postprocessing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing fingerprint database filtering techniques are based on pattern classification [2], relationships among level 1 features [8], orientation information around reference points [5] and relationships among level 2 features [3]. Due to limited information contained in latent fingerprints, a single filtering technique may not be adequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-stage filtering system is proposed, which utilizes pattern type, singular points and orientation field. We have tested our system by searching 258 latent fingerprints in NIST SD27 against a background database containing 10,258 rolled fingerprints (obtained by combining 2,000 in NIST SD4,8,000 in SD14 and 258 in SD27). Although latent fingerprints contain very limited information, the filtering system not only improved the matching speed by three fold but also improved the rank-1 matching accuracy from 70.9% to 73.3%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%