2016
DOI: 10.14257/ijgdc.2016.9.10.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingerprint Liveness Detection Using Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Based Texture Feature

Abstract: Fingerprint-based recognition systems have been widely deployed in numerous civilian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the detection performance of our proposed algorithm, our experimental results are compared with several state-of-the-art approaches, including ULBP [16], HOG [33], MSDCM [9], Winner LCP [29], LLF and HIGMC [30]. Tables 4 and 5 respectively list the newly proposed algorithms on the two data sets LivDet 2013 and LivDet 2011, and we can observe that the ACEs of our method are 1.57 and 0.185 lower than the second place respectively, which are highlighted in bold.…”
Section: Experimental Process and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the detection performance of our proposed algorithm, our experimental results are compared with several state-of-the-art approaches, including ULBP [16], HOG [33], MSDCM [9], Winner LCP [29], LLF and HIGMC [30]. Tables 4 and 5 respectively list the newly proposed algorithms on the two data sets LivDet 2013 and LivDet 2011, and we can observe that the ACEs of our method are 1.57 and 0.185 lower than the second place respectively, which are highlighted in bold.…”
Section: Experimental Process and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, images of any size can be expressed in fixed length vectors without any cropping or scaling operations. Moreover, our method is also robust to fingerprint image deformation without scaling operation [27], [32], [33]. The flowchart of this paper is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In feature-based image-matching methods, feature extraction is a very important component. Traditional feature extraction methods mainly include scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [18], oriented fast and rotated brief (ORB) [19], features from accelerated segment test (FAST) [20], histogram of orientated gradient (HOG) [21], affine-SIFT (ASIFT) [22], binary robust invariant scalable keypoints (BRISK), binary fisheye spherical distorted robust independent elemental features (FSD-BRIEF) [23], etc. Because traditional feature extraction methods do not fully utilize data, they can only extract certain aspects of image features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as a result of overuse, fingerprints are becoming the targets of attackers or imposters. Scholars [4] have proven that intelligent devices with fingerprint identification are vulnerable to artificial replicas made from common materials, such as silica, gelatin, clay, and Play-Doh, and attackers or imposters can hinder these optical and capacitive sensors using these forged fingerprints when fingers press on the surface of the scanners. Thus, one of the common problems with these intelligent devices is that they cannot guarantee the authenticity of fingerprints before identification; specifically, they cannot distinguish between genuine or fake fingerprints [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%