2008
DOI: 10.1142/s0219467808003209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingerprint Silicon Replicas: Static and Dynamic Features for Vitality Detection Using an Optical Capture Device

Abstract: The automatic vitality detection of a fingerprint has become an important issue in personal verification systems based on this biometric. It has been shown that fake fingerprints made using materials like gelatine or silicon can deceive commonly used sensors. Recently, the extraction of vitality features from fingerprint images has been proposed to address this problem. Among others, static and dynamic features have been separately studied so far, thus their respective merits are not yet clear; especially beca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…proposed performs best on the dataset captured with the Biometrika sensor where, for the optimal feature subset, an ACE of 1.73% is reached (over 98% of correctly classified samples). This result clearly improves the one presented in [16] where, on a very similar dataset and using a parameterization based on different static and dynamic features (which need several images to be extracted), a best 17% classification error is reported (almost 10 times higher than the error rate reached with our proposed quality-based approach).…”
Section: B Optimal Feature Subsetssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…proposed performs best on the dataset captured with the Biometrika sensor where, for the optimal feature subset, an ACE of 1.73% is reached (over 98% of correctly classified samples). This result clearly improves the one presented in [16] where, on a very similar dataset and using a parameterization based on different static and dynamic features (which need several images to be extracted), a best 17% classification error is reported (almost 10 times higher than the error rate reached with our proposed quality-based approach).…”
Section: B Optimal Feature Subsetssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…A comparative analysis of different software-based solutions for liveness detection is presented in [16]. The authors study the efficiency of several approaches and give an estimation of the best performing static and dynamic features for vitality detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different liveness detection algorithms have been proposed for traits such as fingerprint [20][21][22], face [23][24][25], or iris [26][27][28]. These algorithms can broadly be divided into:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And iris based systems can be faked with wearable plastic lens or by using fake irises printed on paper. [5] and they can be broadly divided into two approaches; Hardware and software. In the hardware approach a specific device is included to the sensor in order to detect the properties of a living trait such as the blood pressure [6], skin distortion [7] or the odor [8].The main disadvantage of these methods is that they require extra hardware, which is expensive, bulky and not convenient to the users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%