1997
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingerprinting trifoliate orange germ plasm accessions with isozymes, RFLPs, and inter-simple sequence repeat markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
91
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
91
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This transition was genus/ species specific, occurring only in P. trifoliata. As a group, the trifoliate oranges all tend to be similar to one another (Fang et al 1997) and are divergent from the genus Citrus (Nicolosi et al 2000;Barkley et al 2006;Pang et al 2007). This may explain why these alleles of different sizes share the same point mutation in the flanking sequence.…”
Section: Locus Gt03mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transition was genus/ species specific, occurring only in P. trifoliata. As a group, the trifoliate oranges all tend to be similar to one another (Fang et al 1997) and are divergent from the genus Citrus (Nicolosi et al 2000;Barkley et al 2006;Pang et al 2007). This may explain why these alleles of different sizes share the same point mutation in the flanking sequence.…”
Section: Locus Gt03mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (Fang et al, 1997;Fu et al, 2004), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (AkaKacar et al, 2005;Rodriguez et al, 2005), amplified fragment length polymorphism (Fu et al, 2004;Campos et al, 2005), simple sequence repeats (SSR) (Barkley et al, 2006(Barkley et al, , 2009, inter-simple sequence repeats Capparelli et al, 2004), and sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) (Uzun et al, 2009) have been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers such as isozymes, RFLP and RAPD have been applied to study genetic diversity (1,6,7,10,14,29) and relationships within the genus Citrus (15,27) in order to complement morphological data and thus shed more light on the classification of Citrus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%