2010
DOI: 10.2478/s11533-010-0080-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite basis problem for 2-testable monoids

Abstract: A monoid S 1 obtained by adjoining a unit element to a 2-testable semigroup S is said to be 2-testable. It is shown that a 2-testable monoid S 1 is either inherently non-finitely based or hereditarily finitely based, depending on whether or not the variety generated by the semigroup S contains the Brandt semigroup of order five. Consequently, it is decidable in quadratic time if a finite 2-testable monoid is finitely based.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 6. 8. Let u and v be any words in canonical form such that the identity u ≈ v is satisfied by the semigroup T m,n .…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lemma 6. 8. Let u and v be any words in canonical form such that the identity u ≈ v is satisfied by the semigroup T m,n .…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) ℓ is finite meet irreducible (fmi) if, for any finite F ⊆ L , ℓ ≥ F =⇒ ℓ ≥ x for some x ∈ F ; (6) ℓ is strictly join irreducible (sji) if, for any set X ⊆ L , ℓ = X =⇒ ℓ ∈ X ; (7) ℓ is strictly finite join irreducible (sfji) if, for any finite F ⊆ L , ℓ = F =⇒ ℓ ∈ F ; (8) ℓ is strictly meet irreducible (smi) if, for any X ⊆ L , ℓ = X =⇒ ℓ ∈ X ;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now if i ě 3 and x i is nonlinear in w 1 , then equation ( 4) can be used to replace this power by 4. Similarly if the power of x 2 is 3, then equation (5) shows that it can be raised to 4. If the power of x 2 is 2 and the power of x 1 is not 1, then equation (6) shows that x 2 may be raised to the power 4.…”
Section: Compact Smi Pseudovarietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now the theorem follows immediately from Lemmas 3.4, 4.1, and 4.4-4.8. L 4.10 [7,Theorem 3.3]. Any variety that satisfies the identities x 2 ≈ x 3 , x 2 yx ≈ xyx, xyx 2 ≈ xyx, xyxzx ≈ xyzx, (4.13) is finitely based.…”
Section: The Maximal Subvarieties Of Var T T T 2 (F)mentioning
confidence: 99%