2009
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite deformation formulation for embedded frictional crack with the extended finite element method

Abstract: SUMMARYWe reformulate an extended finite element (FE) framework for embedded frictional cracks in elastoplastic solids to accommodate finite deformation, including finite stretching and rotation. For the FE representation, we consider a Galerkin approximation in which both the trial and weighting functions adapt to the current contact configuration. Contact and frictional constraints employ two Kuhn-Tucker conditions, a contact/separation constraint nesting over a stick/slip constraint for the case when the cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of studies have addressed this challenge by employing various algorithms such as the Lagrange multiplier method, the penalty method, the Nitsche method, and their improved versions (e.g. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]). Nevertheless, the optimal way to treat these contact constraints is yet an unresolved issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have addressed this challenge by employing various algorithms such as the Lagrange multiplier method, the penalty method, the Nitsche method, and their improved versions (e.g. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]). Nevertheless, the optimal way to treat these contact constraints is yet an unresolved issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted the superior rates of convergence for the penalty method compared to the LATIN method. The approach has been extended to problems with bulk plasticity (Khoei et al, 2006;Liu and Borja, 2009) and large sliding contact (Khoei and Mousavi, 2010;Liu and Borja, 2010a). It should be noted that these approaches still represent a regularization of a discrete formulation that is unstable, and involve a free penalty parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discontinuous displacement fields in nonlinear contact usually lead to local stress concentration or serious structural damage. 1,2 In cases that the discontinuities are well pre-defined, the finite element method (FEM) can provide an efficient tool to analyze contact problems. However, if a large number of discontinuities are involved and are expected to evolve in an unknown pattern during the simulation, the FEM would require an enormous computational cost to remesh the computational domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear contact behaviors are often encountered in various engineering problems. The discontinuous displacement fields in nonlinear contact usually lead to local stress concentration or serious structural damage 1,2 . In cases that the discontinuities are well pre‐defined, the finite element method (FEM) can provide an efficient tool to analyze contact problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%