2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-012-0024-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Difference Approximation for Fluid-Flow Simulation and Calculation of Permeability in Porous Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the ultra-low permeability of mudstones, it is difficult to experimentally investigate the transport processes inside shales as well as to accurately measure the transport properties. Alternatively, advanced pore-scale numerical methods, such as the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) 16 17 , have been shown to be an efficient alternative 18 19 20 21 22 23 . In the present study, the LBM is employed to simulate fluid flow and Knudsen diffusion processes in shales as well as to predict the transport properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the ultra-low permeability of mudstones, it is difficult to experimentally investigate the transport processes inside shales as well as to accurately measure the transport properties. Alternatively, advanced pore-scale numerical methods, such as the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) 16 17 , have been shown to be an efficient alternative 18 19 20 21 22 23 . In the present study, the LBM is employed to simulate fluid flow and Knudsen diffusion processes in shales as well as to predict the transport properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Euler characteristic ( χ ) for a digital image ( X ) is expressed as χ()X=IL+ where I is the number of isolated objects, L is the number of redundant loops, and O is the number of cavities (Armstrong et al, 2019). Pore size distribution is estimated by a local distance maximum method (Chung et al, 2020; Shabro et al, 2012; Y. D. Wang, Chung, et al, 2020), which is similar to a watershed‐distance transform (Strahler, 1957) or the maximum inscribed spheres method (Silin & Patzek, 2006). Lastly, the corresponding absolute permeability is calculated based on the single phase Lattice‐Boltzmann method (McClure et al, 2014; Y. D. Wang, Chung, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Image Processing and Petrophysical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I is the number of isolated objects, L is the number of redundant loops, and O is the number of cavities (Armstrong et al, 2019). Pore size distribution is estimated by a local distance maximum method (Chung et al, 2020;Shabro et al, 2012;Y. D. Wang, Chung, et al, 2020), which is similar to a watershed-distance transform (Strahler, 1957) or the maximum inscribed spheres method (Silin & Patzek, 2006).…”
Section: Image Processing and Petrophysical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostaghimi et al (2012) applied an algebraic multigrid method to study the permeability anisotropy at the pore scale and opined that rock pores are mainly unidirectionally connected. Shabro et al (2012) applied a finite difference method in which a weighting factor is defined and a Laplace equation is solved to study the flow characteristics of the fluid in the core. Moreover, they considered limestone and dolomite as examples for the practical application of their method and simulated the permeability distribution of rocks well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%